View Single Post
Old 02-12-2014, 06:23 PM   #48
JuniorAWD
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: GTR 9.0@170_XT 10.8@130_GC 8.3@165
Location: P&L Motorsports
Posts: 70
Thanks: 19
Thanked 103 Times in 43 Posts
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift-Office View Post


That was a Dynapack. And Dynojets don't read high, just justifications some use to quantify their work to their customers IMHO.

Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC

A dynojet reads higher then a factory setup mustang dyno or dynodyamics.
Compared to a dynojet 248/224 AWD about 14%, compared to a 424 AWD around 16-18%.
The dynodynamics being the lowest.

Unfortunately all can be altered, especially those DJs at elevation where a simple shift in correction factor settings can pick up 100+whp

None of that shit matters anyway, if you have to try and convince your customers their car is good you failed anyway.

No matter what, at the end of the day all that will matter is the real world performance. You mess with numbers, you are only hurting yourself in the long run when your customers start to figure it out.

Jr
JuniorAWD is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JuniorAWD For This Useful Post:
PrimeMotoring (02-12-2014), sklimo (02-12-2014), Venator (02-13-2014)