Quote:
Originally Posted by Zach3794
Like I said, 10-20hp can easily be attributed to a different dyno. In any case, both kits have the potential for massive top end  |
Not sure for "massive" top end with stock fueling...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sklimo
Mine was dyno'd on Mustang dyno. Maybe dyno in first post is on dynojet??
|
That was a Dynapack. And Dynojets don't read high, just justifications some use to quantify their work to their customers IMHO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Tut
They can read higher OR lower depending.
|
That is correct, and dependent on calibration and gearing settings...
So to quantify and recap :
JRSC :
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...t=52992&page=3
KWSC :
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53538
So I pulled some of the charts off.. this is what the head to head looks like -
Same SC unit, about the same boost (there will be variance because it's belt driven) and an edge goes to the JRSC kit since that project has a HKS EL header. Both kits just came out in Dec, and AFAIK, these were in the first batch of each of the respective companies that were posted...
Now when you take the top SC performer with a header and compare that to an AVO setup at the same boost...
"All things equal, pound for pound of boost, a SC won't outperform a TC."
My 2 cents.
Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC