Quote:
Originally Posted by Wepeel
The fastest STX twin (autocross) was running KW V3's with the front and rear springs swapped at for 400/340 F/R, in addition to a stiffer front bar.
RCE and CSG seem to prefer even rates or more rear-biased, depending on stiffness it seems (what Andy was talking about keeping the frequency bias the same vs the spring rate bias).
|
That's because if you want to be competitive, an AutoX setup and a track setup are mutually exclusive.
AutoX priorities:
- lightning fast weight shifts and small direction changes (less than 30 degrees). This is for slaloming.
-- This is achieved by REALLY high front spring rates, and a giant front sway
-- This also makes it so that under sustained cornering (sweepers), the car pushes like CRAZY, so that's why AutoX cars go deep, brake hard, and power out, rather than make a more rounded arc.
Track priorities:
- Sustained cornering speed, and being able to put power down at corner exits
-- This is achieved by getting a nice static balance.
-- Keep in mind that under power, you're unloading the front, and loading the rear.
-- Track prepped cars will sustain more raw cornering Gs, but not change direction and shift weight as quickly.
For example:
AutoX prepped FRS
- 14k/9k spring rates
- Blade type front sway, minimal rear sway
Track prepped FRS
- 10/12k spring rates
- Sways to fine tune balance.
Each car has its strengths and weaknesses. The AutoX car will likely slalom ~20% faster (raw mph), but the track prepped FRS will hold more speed on a skidpad (raw mph).