Thread: OFT vs. Ecutek
View Single Post
Old 01-26-2014, 10:46 PM   #117
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,470 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelsmar View Post
Well I'll gladly be your be first. I personally would prefer to do a simple MAF based tune. However the JRSC car mentioned earlier I am forced to use SD to allow it to rev to the factory rev limit. This will take additional time and effort and is required as we have maxed out the maf on this kit. Without modifying the maf, upgrading the maf, or lowering the rev limit I do in fact have to use SD.
Just to make sure it is clear, one does not modify or upgrade the MAF sensor itself. One makes changes the diameter of the housing it is mounted in and then re-calibrates the MAF sensor response curve to accommodate the new mass air:voltage relationship.
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote