View Single Post
Old 12-30-2013, 06:13 PM   #23
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by raul View Post
This is an extremely narrow minded statement that pays no attention to how much fuel is being burnt to produce those numbers. Try again.
So a performance car built fifty years ago burned a little more gas than the ones built today so that invalidates their importance in automotive history? I found a Car and Driver test drive review, 14-18 mpg, not bad for something with a better power to weight ratio than what we bought. Interesting read, they used to be so much more technical.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ad-test-review

I don't know, guess I gotta bite my tongue and not feed the troll.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote