Thread: BRZ vs E46 M3
View Single Post
Old 02-24-2012, 04:52 PM   #64
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,012 Times in 2,098 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTSHC View Post
I can't deal with you anymore. You're a judgemental extremist that refuses to see the "compromise" in anything outside your own ideals.
I'm all about compromise. *Everything* is a compromise and I recognise that.

Quote:
You pretend as though there isn't anything practical out there past 3000lb's now THAT's "LUDICROUS".
Not sure what you're saying here, so no comment.

Quote:
What about lightening an average weight car is Ludicrous?
For a given price point, if you want a fast dedicated track car, it's LUDICROUS to start with a heavy car. You will need more power, more brakes, more structural stiffness, etc. to achieve the same speed vs. a lighter-weight car. AND you'll spend a LOT more money to run it.

Quote:
A car doesn't NEED to be 2400lbs to perform superbly
No, but as weight goes up, cost to achieve a speedy lap time also goes up, *and* you lose the immediacy of a smaller/lighterweight car.

Quote:
and frankly many people ENJOY high horsepower mid-weight vehicles.
Count me in, I certainly do!

Quote:
And truthfully I don't consider something a "pig" or overweight until it reaches higher than 3800lbs,
Depends on the application, of course. For me, that number would be closer to 3200 for a real-world daily driven sports car.

Quote:
and I honestly could give less of a f*** whether or not YOU agree with that statement. Adding you to the ignore list now, your mentality and narrowminded view of the automotive world angers me.
GOOD RIDDANCE!
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote