View Single Post
Old 12-24-2013, 01:09 PM   #19555
captain_jack
Senior Member
 
captain_jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '13 raven frs, '10 taco,09 gsxr 600
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,342
Thanks: 530
Thanked 394 Times in 297 Posts
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelsmar View Post
I can type details or show ya in person later. Literally nearly nothing. My first e85 map I did the same thing shiv did with injector scaling etc. My new e85 map is actually flex fuel. It does not touch anything that oft uses. It actually has a table for ethanol content and a fuel modification table specifically altering the final output fuel quantity before the Ecu checks the do to port ratio for actual injection cycle. This way the Ecu still functions normally and you don't have to "hack" a bunch of tables to pretend your using smaller injectors than you are. As may tables refrence eachother this is more ideal. Also data logging is farrow advanced and for higher power speed density is quite desired. I personally will be forced to use speed density for my engine. Which as of current is not widely supported. It will be supported eventually but I would rather use a corporately tested speed density platform first. That and ecutek has been awesome with support with me. I get lengthy emails back in minutes.

When is the next time you are in Phoenix? I can show you a comparison and you can show me what is new in the oft world. Also tuning an additional car you just buy another license. It is acceptable to share cables. So if two people want to go half it's just fine.
Ok with all that being said what is the cost of the cable by itself? And on flip side what is the cost of just the license by itself? Just figured id ask the questions to help in this discussion as i am also looking at both platforms for my turbo build.

sent from your mom
captain_jack is offline   Reply With Quote