Quote:
Originally Posted by tranzformer
We just might have different priorities. For a DD I would take a BRZ over a 10-17 year old Supra. If it was for a project car to work on then sure maybe the Supra is a better choice for the OP. Old cars deal with wear and tear not knowing how well previous owners took care of them.
Anyways OP seems to have made up his mind. He views Supra as a better car. It isn't our job to convince him the BRZ is better. I personally would take a new BRZ because of being new, NA, lightweight...etc.
|
i see your point but he asked us. i also kind of wonder what this whole green thing has done to reliability. fundamentally, the supra is a tough as cars get. i wouldnt be surprised if a clean, late supra would last longer than a brand new frs. in my head it would be just about a wash since you would lose in maintenance initially on the supra but you would get back in the lack of depreciation. i hope the frs becomes a big deal but with a supra we know it is.
maybe im just partial since ive had a mk2 and 3 supra and the earlier had over 400k on the odo when i got rid of it with no major issues