View Single Post
Old 12-16-2013, 02:29 AM   #342
ztan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 362 Times in 145 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Td-d View Post
I think both are port scaling - the one I defined originally has the same logic that I've seen over and over in the roms - but it was pointed out o me ht the other value is that defined by oft and brzedit as the scaling. I would be interested to hear feedback from someone whether my original scaling does the job.
I have tested with the following.

Stock scalings: Td-d 222.32 (2707090/x); BRZ 228.05 (60000/x, 263.1 raw)

Stock ROM:
Idle till IPW1=0: STFT+LTFT = -7.15%

Stock ROM, all GDI maps changed to 100% port:
Idle till IPW1=0: STFT+LTFT = -11.05%

Td-d scaling to 232.32, GDI at 100% port:
Idle till IPW1=0: STFT+LTFT = -10.17%

BRZ scaling to 218.18 (275 raw), GDI at 100% port:
Idle till IPW1=0: STFT+LTFT = -13.1%

BRZ scaling to 240 (250 raw), GDI at 100% port:
Idle till IPW1=0: STFT+LTFT = -4.41%

BRZ scaling to 250 (240 raw), GDI at 100% port:
Idle till IPW1=0: STFT+LTFT = -0.48%

BRZ scaling to 250 (240 raw), GDI back at stock:
Idle till IPW1=0: STFT+LTFT = -0.32%

BRZ scaling at 235 (255 raw) and Td-d scaling to 235, GDI stock:
Idle till IPW1=0: STFT+LTFT = -2.71%

Last edited by ztan; 12-20-2013 at 08:53 AM.
ztan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ztan For This Useful Post:
mad_sb (12-18-2013)