Quote:
Originally Posted by Shad0ez
To those that have replied so far, thank you for taking the time to do so. It's a good start to understanding what we're looking at.
Would it be possible to take it one step further and provide a range that each of the parameters should be in?
|
that's not really how you want to look at it. you don't want to just watch numbers fly across a screen and look out for bad ones. you want to collect a pretty massive amount of data, throw away the noise and then look for trends in what's left. there are some things that just shouldn't be there, like timing being pulled in one way or another or significant afr error. but you might use this data to create a scatterplot of instances of > -1.4 fbkc on load and rpm axes or something like that. also it's not safe to stare at the device while driving
