View Single Post
Old 12-11-2013, 09:05 PM   #62
utekineir
blowhard
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: frs, project forester
Location: ma
Posts: 980
Thanks: 53
Thanked 604 Times in 316 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy View Post
My base tune made 10whp, 5ft lbs and was too lean. After remotely revising the tune it made 17whp and 10ft lbs with perfect AFR. My tune was done in only 1 hour.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy View Post
with OFT I'd only have 60% of the whp gain, possibly be running lean and waiting for a quote from Shiv for the cost of e-tuning to fix it.
Considering the inconsistencies across base maps from all tuners and the ecutek model of fine tuning doesn't it seem kind of stupid applying the results of your experience with one tuners base map on one platform to all tuners base maps on all tuning platforms?

Obviously an ots tune is not as good as a custom tune except in the case of tuner incompetence. But to apply your findings of your base tune ratio to a different product, on a different tuning platform, by a different tuner.

That's real retarded sir

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy View Post
All I see above are incorrect "facts", heavily biased comparisons and opinion!
Oh I agree, I agree so much

I don't have a dog in the fight, I want to see evolution of the platform as a whole.

but your posts are typically subjective biased horseshit


will be forum hired gun for free oft
utekineir is offline   Reply With Quote