Thread: winter tires
View Single Post
Old 11-30-2013, 05:33 PM   #11
dsgerbc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: BRZ(sold), STI
Location: A2, MI
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 176
Thanked 419 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suberman View Post
You are trying to compare apples to oranges. The Altimax is designed for studs so won't compare to studless tires. It does excel in its category:

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...y.jsp?ttid=123

Note it outperforms other stud intended tires even when not studded.

You'll get longer tread life and greater bare road stability from a winter tire designed to be studded, if no studs are fitted, than you will from a studless rubber design. Your choice depends on what you expect and what you need.

General is owned by Continental and benefits from industry leading tire technology.
Like I said , if you care about winter dry grip - get performance winter rubber, which will be better in the dry and comparable in snow/ice.

Altimax is owned by Continental and reuses Conti's decade-old designs. Gislaved NF3 was a top studded tire 10+ years ago.


Tirerack's 'studded' category doesn't include ANY good studded tire. It's literally all junk. Nothing from Nokian/Michelin/Conti/etc. There are TONS of studded tire tests in European mags. None of tirerack's list are any good.
dsgerbc is offline   Reply With Quote