Quote:
Originally Posted by EcuTek
OK, perhaps we didn’t make that very clear. None of us are sitting around twiddling our thumbs here. We have set ourselves some pretty hard targets to get done by the end of the year and when we said quick that is relative to how long it takes to develop features for the first car. It still takes a few months and we support GT-R, STi/WRX, 370Z, Mazda MX 5, CX 5, MPS, 6 and diesels, Subaru DiT, BRZ/GT-86/FR-S to name but a few and we have suggestions by the hundreds coming into us every day as to what we should do next, extra features here, updates there. So it becomes a commercial decision as to where we apply our limited resources to get maximum effect. We have 3 people working constantly on our GT-86/BRZ/FR-S announcement at the moment so rest assured there is a lot of focus on your community of owners. We are trying to do our best for you.
|
I wasn't trying to sound like you guys aren't working hard. Just trying to understand why the features for one vehicle that maybe helpful for another vehicle are not being utilized. I realize time and money are always a factor demand is always high for a large variety of things this product could do. It just seems like features that are developed for one should be developed for another. That wouldn't hurt your demand it would improve it.
Im not trying to start a big huge debate. I think your product is very impressive and powerful for using the stock ECU. That is all I wont be commenting in this thread until the full news release is made.
