View Single Post
Old 11-26-2013, 12:19 AM   #16
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,520
Thanks: 3,542
Thanked 7,415 Times in 3,033 Posts
Mentioned: 311 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike156 View Post
Many cars use bumpstops as a second spring now (many put the car on the bumpstop at normal ride height even). It lets them use a soft spring for normal driving then the spring package goes very progressive over larger bumps. Modern springs are wound in a manner to offset the bending load put on the strut. I wouldn't be surprised if the bumpstop approach is a way to keep strut friction down, along with soft ride rates, but then the ability to soak up big stuff.
YEP ! And to add to it....

Porsche, BMW and Mercedes have done this for over 30 years, especially in their low gas, twin tube use. They design in TONS of droop travel but little bump travel and instead use the progressive bump rubber to pick up where the spring left off. For an OEM car this works well. LArge sways, progressive bump rubber and tons of droop means a LARGE pothole doesnt disrupt the car(or the occupants).

Take that same car and lower it? ....and NOW a nice mid corner bump turns into a mid corner DITCH/ JERSEY BARRIER/ CAR NEXT TO YOU fender !

Myles Williams
RCE since 2003
Racecomp Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post:
86•BRZ (11-26-2013)