Quote:
Originally Posted by Cross
So much for stoping right?
I'm at the bash and I have again asked you to stop you are not interested that's fine and that's where it should end.
The same company could very well be involved in making the clutch however as pointed out 1986 vs 2003 and the concept just because you can jump doesn't mean you should vs proven heavy use has been addressed.
Thanks
|
Well, I am on the forum to learn. Don't think we are on the same page. Participating in a discussion with valid info doesn't seem to sit well with you but that is your issue to deal with.
Anyway, again, how was I misinformed?
What are the differences in the setup between the 1986 toyota SC vs 2003 MB SC other than the charger?
What were their reasons for going with the clutched type SC?
What are their reasons for not utilising the clutched setup anymore?
What are your reasons other than it's different? How is it feasible?
What do you mean by easily removed?
What do you mean by proven heavy use? I wasn't and never talked about the reliability of the clutched pulley setup. What are you actually proving?