Thread: 2.5" vs 3"
View Single Post
Old 11-12-2013, 03:08 PM   #4
ecko04
Seems Legit
 
ecko04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Toyota
Location: Here & There
Posts: 855
Thanks: 187
Thanked 438 Times in 250 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
2.5" vs 3"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jericon View Post
Yup... didn't even think to search. Thanks.
It's all good. 2.5", 2.75" and 3" have been discussed pretty extensively.

In a nutshell, for the NA vehicle 2.5" is fine.

Any form of FI will benefit from larger diameter piping.

If I were even thinking about FI, I would go with 3" or at the minimum a 2.5" overpipe, larger and less restrictive front pipe and a 3" catback section.

Then it's a matter of what sound you like.

The benefit of larger diameter piping with a FI setup is that you're adding more exhaust gas and it needs to go somewhere. The larger piping keeps excessive exhaust gas temps down and will build boost, on a turbocharged setup, quicker than smaller diameter piping. There may be some weight savings as well. Oh...and it sounds cool.
__________________
No build thread. I don't want to be reminded of how much money I spent.
[insert profound quote here]
ecko04 is offline   Reply With Quote