View Single Post
Old 03-31-2010, 06:02 AM   #180
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtodd View Post
You don't think the K20Z3 would comply with upcoming 2012 Emissions? It's currently running at LEV-2 standards.. Not too bad IMHO. Pretty sure it wouldn't be difficult to bring it to PZEV levels with some Honda factory tinkering.

But the fact of the matter is that there ARE engine manufactures out there that still know how to make a damn good engine available for ~$24k, in terms of power.. Honda is one, and Toyota is another. Subaru, on the other hand, have never mass-produced an N/A engine (to the consumer market) that meets the 100hp/liter ratio. I personally think they rely too much on their turbos to get the numbers up...

I really hope that Toyota does some magic on the heads for this silly little boxer engine, because seriously, the N/A variant 2.0L boxer is pretty damn weak compared to other N/A 2.0's out there.
Oh I do agree that hp/l for Subie sux... but don't forget, it's awd. I can't think of any Honda or Toyota engine that had i4, 2.5l or smaller, NA, AWD car that had better hp/l then Subie. I stand to be corrected.

I'm pretty sure if Subaru didn't have to worry bout AWD so much, they could of made good hp/l engine.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote