View Single Post
Old 10-28-2013, 09:54 PM   #376
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrogDor the Burninator View Post
I'm not so sure the 3 pulleys need to be cut to match the cogs ...

so long as the pulleys have a bevel of some sort on the inside edge it will collect the belt and spin accordingly provided there is proper tension in the belt system ...

As for the pulley count and placement, I seem to remember a best practice of having a pulley between each cogged wheel in a machinist environment ... not sure if that applies to engine bays ... It's been years since I had that training ...
I don't know how a cogged belt would react to the cyclical compression of the cogs caused by being under tension while running over a smooth faced pulley. My thought is that the belt wouldn't like it at all, which would either diminish the belts life, or require cogged idler pulleys.

Two pulleys would still satisfy that best practice, would it not? My thought is that there would be two pulleys on either side of the compressor, but lower instead of above the compressor pulley.

I'm not trying to argue here, I'm just trying to expand on my earlier post to ensure I wasn't misunderstood. I posted my idea expecting to be told it wouldn't work, I'm just not sure why it wouldn't work.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote