Thread: Frs vs s2000
View Single Post
Old 10-24-2013, 02:48 PM   #810
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmong337 View Post
Both cars are great, both will win. Obviously stock vs stock, the S2K wins. But everybody knows the FRS needs a turbo. That's where the 400hp vs 400hp example sets in. It's a toss up.

Why so butthurt?
Problem is, you can make 400hp on a S2k reliably and sustainably with just the following:

- Bolt on kit
- Tune
- Engine Cooling

You need the following to make 400hp on a FRS reliably and sustainably:

- Extreme kit
or
- bolt-on kit + heavy headwork
- Tune
- Engine Cooling
- Oil cooling
- Upgraded transmission (no options unless you go sequential.... $$$$$$)
- Upgraded axles

Even then, nobody REALLY knows long term reliability, cuz most 400hp cars have blown up or broken stuff, and have gone down.


This is the result of slapping on a supercharger on the S2k; this car is heavily tracked.

CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote