View Single Post
Old 10-24-2013, 02:22 AM   #18
Dephective
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FRS
Location: Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 233
Thanks: 110
Thanked 79 Times in 58 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Circuit Motorsports View Post

I could go on and list differences and correct some things but it would just turn another thread into a Ecutek > Opensource debate...which I doubt people want to see.

If either of you wants to discuss tuning/prices/differences in software we'd be happy to, but probably best done via PM.

I know the current pros and cons of each. I understand the lack of support for FI with the OFT.. for now.


Like I said, if it's not available when I'm ready, there will be no choice for me but to go the ECUtek route, hoping that shortly after FI will be supported by OFT. My comments where just my thoughts on WHY I want OFT vs ECUtek, and I think that there are a lot of people with my same concerns. This thread was specifically about FI and OFT, not "hey ECUtek already supports this, and OFT doesn't!" We already know this, and we know the major vendors on here that support it. What we are addressing are those tuners who have plans for OFT when the support becomes available for FI.

My other comments weren't toward any specific vendor here, I was merely addressing the overall attitude of vendors toward OFT who currently use ECUtek.
__________________
Previous:

'01 Accord-daily
'93 Rx7-fire breathing track monster 545hp 397tq 2300lb.
'06 Mazdaspeed6 one helluva love-hate relationship
Dephective is offline   Reply With Quote