10-21-2013, 10:19 AM
|
#70
|
|
Hockey Playing Scientist
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited 6MT (WRB)
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 145
Thanks: 2
Thanked 33 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AznKirby
RSX-S has legendary reliability.
I went to the dealership not too long ago to test drive an FRS and I must say I did not expect to be this underwhelmed. My RSX-S barely has any mods on it (i/h/e) and I still remember how it was stock. I'm not really sure what numbers say, but stock for stock I do feel like the k20 would be quicker.
I did feel a pretty vast difference in handling (the FRS being better, obviously)
As far as interior goes, someone mentionned that FRS>>RSX .. I disagree. For a 10+ year old car, some of it feels better as far as quality goes. (wtf cupholders?)
The RSX is much more versatile too, being a hatch.
That being said, I am looking to sell my type-s and going with an frs/brz, so I guess all in all, RWD>FWD.
|
Try taking a look at the BRZ Limited if you'd like a slightly upgraded interior. You may find you like the added amenities coming from the RSX.
|
|
|