Quote:
Originally Posted by regal
So WTF is Nameless doing sending a crap Viscoti-hack tune to a major auto publication for review? Journalists expect the vendor to know what the fuck they are doing
|
Readers expect Journalists to know what the fuck they're doing as well. This "test" was poorly conceived and even more poorly executed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal
Nameless embarrassed themselves.
|
Quite a few people are embarrassing themselves in this thread. Nameless however, is not one of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal
How is nameless even evaluating these headers if their tuner is Viscoti?
|
This header was sent to them almost a year ago, before Visconti had his falling out with the community. See Jason's quotes from the comment section for other clarifications.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jason@Nameless
"Want to make a few comments on this. Those are our company's parts and we offered to send the overpipe downpipe along with the Axleback exhaust but it appears they did not run it after it was sent along with a header they requested us to design, fabricate and deliver in 3 days door to door. So we took a shot in the dark with that header and sent a number of tunes to test with it that were between our full long tube race header tune and our short factory fit header"
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jason@Nameless
The long and the short of it is that they didn't have the time to use any but the first tune sent which was for a header that allows much more aggressive tuning. No surprise the first setup was too rich and had to aggressive a cam timing. Life goes on.
|
Coming from someone who just said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal
Yea every header is shit without a good tune. The tune is an integral piece.
|
You'd think that the significance of their only testing only one of the multiple tunes included would not be lost on you. Apparently that isn't the case.