View Single Post
Old 10-03-2013, 01:24 PM   #36
bfrank1972
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S Argento
Location: Westport,CT
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 517
Thanked 1,041 Times in 616 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Phantom Charger Poll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary in NJ View Post
I like the Innovative system. But the other things you get with it are higher IAT and higher fuel burn. For the cost, nothing will boost like the Phantom ESC at low rpm...right where this engine needs the most help.
Same here, I like what Innovate has done, and I dig the sounds it makes. Curiosity got the best of me though, so I took a posted Innovate baseline dyno (hope you don't mind sw20kosh!) and overlaid the thattruth2001's dyno from Drift-Office on top. Take it for what it's worth:

1) Both are dynojets, but not the same, not same location, not same day, etc.
2) Cars are not equal - I don't know what bolt ons thattruth2001 has. The innovate car has overpipe and downpipe I think.

Purpose of this is to roughly compare the *shape* of the two curves more than anything. Disclaimer: I don't want any flak, I don't want any naysayers, not trying to prove anything, not saying they are directly comparable, it's just in the name of research

Red lines are Innovate out of the box, 91 octane. Blue lines are Innovate with some sort of meth injection, 91 octane. Dark green is thattruth2001's baseline, the two upper light green lines are hp and torque for the ESC during drift-office's test.

The innovate shows significant advantage over the ESC 6000 rpm and above, the ESC shows significant advantage over the Innovate system below about 4500. Will be interesting to see how the new compressor gains over the existing ESC.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by bfrank1972; 10-04-2013 at 08:01 AM.
bfrank1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bfrank1972 For This Useful Post:
BRAWL (10-03-2013), DAEMANO (10-03-2013), dehydratedH2O (11-19-2013), s2d4 (10-09-2013)