View Single Post
Old 09-23-2013, 06:30 PM   #31
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,470 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vgi View Post
yep, i would guess number of folks would rather use familiar ecutech interface and features they know how to access.

yep, so does ecutech and OFT/BRZEdit/romraider/ecuflash

it's like saying that if you have a pirated photoshop license key and software installation binary or disk then once you install and register this photoshop with pirated key you will only be able to see the images but not modify or save them.
the clones would only be used for figuring out the licensing algorithm/handshake between the tune and software using authentic cable.
as for modifying cloned ecu, if you're interested, using the original cable - you should ask shiv if it's doable, i would guess yes since he was able to flash back to stock tune.

but again, these are just my speculations and you might be right

neither do I care. when I decide on what to get - I will just pay the money to support the solution I like.
imo, OFT shouldn't have tried reading and deciphering EcuTech tunes. This is IP of other people and that's how they make money. Now though it's been compromised. Now that BrzEdit allows reading and flashing free tunes from OFT it also may hurt sales of OFT. It's a war out there.
There is no "deciphering" of ecutek tunes. They use the same map addresses as the stock tune. And we read an ecutek rom using the standard read protocol used to read stock roms. We won't even bother trying to crack the ecutek security because, IMHO, it's not necessary or even worth doing given other (better) options.
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Shiv@Openflash For This Useful Post:
vgi (09-23-2013)