View Single Post
Old 09-13-2013, 03:54 PM   #22
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dem00n View Post
The idea of a flat 6 would make the car more expensive, no one wants that.
ALL of the options listed for increasing power would make the car more expensive... That's a silly argument in this context.

In 1967 Porsche 911S came with a 2L flat 6 producing 180 hp, fifty years later I think we could pull a little more out of the same package, if they maintained the 86mm/86mm bore/stroke we'd get a 3L, certainly a viable option if not realistic historically, but hey who the hell guessed you could ever buy a Toyota with a boxer in it?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote