Quote:
Originally Posted by alex_86
sorry but your analogy of the situation is rather pathetic and insulting due to how retarded it sounds. the analogy you used does not pertain to an exact statement similar to what he is saying. Now, back to the topic one it should have been replaced under warranty if he even knew what his warranty is. The dealership i work at is rated number 1 in the dfw area and through the manufacture they warranty tires whether it be a nail , piece of shrapnel or a raccoon.
|
No, the tyre should not be replaced under warranty because he struck a stray nail, which was out of his and the manufacturer's control. If he purchased warranty for his TYRES then yes, he is entitled to a new one.
I'm assuming that OP was trying to get this tyre replaced under manufacturer's warranty? If that is the case, there is absolutely no way in hell they'll give him a new tyre.
And HENCE that's what an analogy is.. it isn't an exact statement lol, rather it is a correspondence or partial similarity between the two situations.
Good day to you sir.