View Single Post
Old 08-15-2013, 04:37 PM   #945
IceFyre13th
Senior Member
 
IceFyre13th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Mazdarati
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 608
Thanked 1,369 Times in 675 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jordanrw260 View Post
Is this what everyone should expect to experience when upgrading to a header while using a Unichip or is this an isolated problem? Does anyone else run a head with the unichip without a problem?
No, you needed to read more.......

Quote:
Originally Posted by UniChip Jack
Rough running after installing a header isn’t a “tuning” issue… the header’s impact on an airflow based tune is actually pretty minor. It is an emissions issue.

It's not even really the header per se, if you use the same header with a cat (with a stock front pipe cat) you won’t have a problem. That’s why the header companies recommend you keep the cat.

Unfortunately, when you delete one or both cats, the OEM ECU quickly declares a cat efficiency fault (which all street legal vehicles must do) that results in a CEL and poor performance on some vehicles.

Beyond the timing and fueling changes for a header with cat, what the “no cat tune” does is turn off the cat code. Only problem is that’s completely illegal and what cost Edge Products better than 7-figures in fines and penalties… http://www.dieselnet.com/news/2013/01epa.php.

If you use an O2 spacer or spark plug non-fouler on the downstream O2 sensor port, you’ll avoid the fault code and should be golden.
__________________
It's only impossible if you stop to think about it.
IceFyre13th is offline   Reply With Quote