Quote:
Originally Posted by chanomatik
So a Rav4 handles as close to an exotic as the FT-86? Because that's what it sounds like you're saying. Close is a relative term. If the BRZ isn't even close then you're pretty much saying that no car that mere mortals can attain is close and they're all equal, which they're not. Each car is purpose built. I get defensive when people miss the purpose of the FT-86. Everyone has plenty of choices for power. Why does the FT-86 have to be everything?
It's perfect at what it was built for and that's the bottom line. Anything beyond that is available aftermarket and subject to one's personal preferences.
Now, if we're saying it was built FOR THE TRACK, then... it fails at that. hahaha But we know it wasn't, it's just "trackable", which... is very subjective.
|
I've put down faster laps in 100% bone stock Rav4 at the track than I have in a 100% bone stock FRS/BRZ. Sure the FRS/BRZ handles better, but not enough to overcome a power deficiency.
Absolutely serious.
For the record, the Rav4 is faster than the CRV and Ford Escape on track.
The car suffers from a viscous cycle of not having enough power. It doesn't have enough power, so they put skinny tires on it, which compromises handling.
Imagine having a 300hp 300tq turbo version for $37k. All the sudden, you have the attention of all the 370Z/Mustang/Camaro buyers as well.