View Single Post
Old 08-01-2013, 11:52 AM   #99
hmong337
Emperor JDM
 
hmong337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
I obviously stuck quite the nerve with you fanboys LOL. But it's statements like "A stock MR-S will cream a stock FRS" is what does not hold. Darksunrise posted the data. Have a look and stop crying.

The new FRS is better. Of course not better than 2zzge MR-s but that's apples to oranges because you've already modifed the MR-s. What's so hard to understand about that? Stock vs modified. Put a Full Blown kit on the FRS and it would blow the doors off the MR-S w/ 2zz. It's stupid even comparing as there is no basis between a stock frs and a modified mr-s. Either you compare cars that are similarly modified to each other or compare them as they left the factory floor. An MR-S w/ a 2zz is not stock no matter what you believe. It did not leave the factory that way.

If you can't grasp the concept of having a completely balanced car with the emphasis on a low CG progress then you might as well stop now. This car is probably the best car I drove in terms of balance next to my cousins Cayman. Just look at all the reviews from nearly every automotive journalist. I don't know who you guys are trying to convince. Just keep telling yourselves that the MR-S is better. There's nothing we can do for you here. Might as well head back on over to spyderchat and get off on your MR-S where people care.
__________________
hmong337 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to hmong337 For This Useful Post:
WolfpackS2k (08-02-2013)