Quote:
Originally Posted by solma
I not against the idea, just saying if he afraid of some restriction that would cause a lot of loss power, this would be more efficient way to do it. When i say efficient, I mean, longevity and mpg and electrical charge on the alternator/regulator and so on, I do not know want kind of motor he will use, but spinning continuously a high rpm motor could possibly not be efficient in term of live.
|
It would be turning at a small percentage of max most of the time.
To be honest, though, this thing could turn out to be affordable enough and easy enough to work on that if I knew I would have to replace the motor every two years, it wouldn't upset me.
...and I really like the idea of improved throttle response.
__________________
Necessity may be the mother of Invention but Desperation is quite often the father.
“Sex is like Bridge. If you don't have a good partner, you'd better have a good hand.” - Mae West
Papa said, "son there's a lot of evil temptations out there. Best to try 'em all so you know which ones to avoid."