Quote:
Originally Posted by mid_life_crisis
This is the one point I would argue about. Fenton has found that having the system set to run at low level when not engaged does not drain the batteries and by the nature of the beast puts a very slight amount of pressurization on the system that makes a noticeable improvement in throttle response. Plus we are trying to keep the install as affordable and simple as possible. We want to avoid adding any more hardware than is absolutely necessary.
If we can figure out an affordable way to use existing electronics (Unichip?) rather than reinventing the wheel, that would make sense too.
|
I not against the idea, just saying if he afraid of some restriction that would cause a lot of loss power, this would be more efficient way to do it. When i say efficient, I mean, longevity and mpg and electrical charge on the alternator/regulator and so on, I do not know want kind of motor he will use, but spinning continuously a high rpm motor could possibly not be efficient in term of live.