View Single Post
Old 07-04-2013, 11:24 AM   #39
Gary in NJ
Senior Member
 
Gary in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: WR Blue BRZ, 240Z
Location: Amongst the twisty roads
Posts: 587
Thanks: 21
Thanked 412 Times in 206 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRiSson View Post
Your numbers are a little off Gary.

MT: 25mpg EPA Average.
100,000/25 = 4,000 gals

AT: 28mpg EPA Average.
100,000/28 = 3,571 gals

Savings with AT (4,000 - 3,571 =) 429 gals

429 x $3.75 per gallon/premium gas = $1,609 for 100,000 miles.

Note: in real world driving, the difference in MPG AT to MT appears to be much smaller.
Yeah, I was thinking real world numbers. Usually the difference between an MT and a AT is about 1 mpg. I routinely get 35-36 mpg highway and about 28 around town (although I live in a rural area so "around town" doesn't include a lot of stop and go or lights). It seems reasonable that a AT would be about 1 mpg above those numbers.

Regardless, choosing an AT over a MT for mileage is just a lazy excuse for saying "I don't like to drive a MT...can't be bothered". It's not for everyone.
__________________
Phantom ESC, ECUtek Tune, Nameless Front Pipe & Axle Back, Enkei RS+M 17x8 et35, OEM+Ref


Gary in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote