Quote:
Originally Posted by jacobzking
there are LOTS of reasons for being curious. for one... $27,000. i spent the money, I have the right to know who built what. second, there are companies that do some things better than others. toyota has GREAT paint, Subaru notably not just as an example. some companies use better (insert your choice of car part here), some companies don't.
i've owned a lot of nice cars over the years (the NSX with its 26 layer paint job), infiniti fx45 (its infamous oil drinking rings and wobbly rotors), acura RLs that go 160k on a single timing belt, LS430 UltraLux with bad air shocks... there are just some things that other car makers do better than others.
as far as your whole construction worker vs architect question... i dont think many people would hire a world renowned architect, and then hire day laborers to do the job. you have to look at the whole package. if you hire a great architect, then shit for labor, the architect doesn't matter. you have to look at the whole scope of the build.
|
spending all that money doesnt give you any rights to know anything about the car. if we had those rights, this wouldnt be a thread. you make a valid point however for wanting to know prior to the purchase but i was thinking about it in the typicl scion vs subaru terms this forum usually takes so thanks for broadening my perspective. i hadnt even thought about it that way.
if people hired shitty labor or not, it doesnt change the fact that its not the construction workers who get the credit. im not saying its irrelevant, im just saying that having subaru stamped on a body part doesnt mean they should get any more credit.
my bottom line is trying to divide the work up is retarded because thats not how a creative process works.