Quote:
Originally Posted by SubieNate
As an engineer I would agree, and I don't know the tuner/shop my brother had the work done at personally, but from a business standpoint I can see the logic in wanting your setup to read closer to something people recognize as a standard. It may be that the owner has just from experience found that cars read about the same on his dyno as a Mustang Dyno so that's what he tells his customers it's comparable to reading wise since it's not one of the big 3 brands.
Cheers
Nathan
|
But any load dyno should read about the same....and they do. Ive owned a mustang and a dynodynamics and worked quite a bit on super flow. Unmolested, they are all very close. We know dynojet was a deliberated fudge but also an inertia dyno first and foremost.
Locally here, a gt500 just dynod 720 on a dynocom and 590 on mustang. I would put it at 650 dynojet based on experience.