View Single Post
Old 06-20-2013, 12:55 AM   #11
dsgerbc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: BRZ(sold), STI
Location: A2, MI
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 176
Thanked 419 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonewolf View Post
I don't know exactly what you are referring to, your overly bolded statements are tremendously vague and unclear. Do you know warranty/contract/consumer law?
My 'overly bolded statements' used exactly the font size you used.
Nothing vague about it. Aftermarket often brings up M-M, and in most cases what they say is wishful thinking.

Your bolded stament are taken right out of SEMA playbook. They have nothing to do with what the M-M act states.

If you put parts that violate OEM specs, M-M does not apply.

Now, in practice, a lot of cases where consumers manage to get the manufacturers to honor (the previously denied) claims is where the failure is common and does occur to cars w/o any modifications.

Basically, all I'm saying is that one should use common sense. If you're reflashed - M-M does not apply, do not come to the dealer citing SEMA interpretation of the M-M and expecting them to cut you some slack.
dsgerbc is offline   Reply With Quote