View Single Post
Old 06-13-2013, 04:22 PM   #863
mines13
 
mines13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '13 FR-S '12 CBR1000RR
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 305
Thanked 527 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to mines13 Send a message via Yahoo to mines13
Quote:
Originally Posted by nonicname View Post
can someone explain to me why SC are making less power with the same boost than turbos?
I guess it's because the SC takes energy from the engine to create more energy?
Yes, a supercharger will have inherently greater parasitic losses then a turbocharger. Positive displacement superchargers would again still have greater parasitic loses then a centrifugal supercharger. That said, compressor outlet temps would typically be the lowest out of a twin screw PD configuration for a few reasons, with turbochargers having the highest exducer temps. There is no physical contact between the screws, and the screw speeds are about 1/3rd of what they would be in a centrifugal or turbocharger's compressor. It has been mentioned previously, but another major advantage is due to the nature of how a twin screw moves/compresses air, it builds boost virtually instantly making your engine feel like it has more displacement. Positive displacement superchargers are not load dependent like a turbocharger or completely RPM dependent like a centrifugal.

All of that said, turbocharging, centrifugal and twin screw froms of mechanical forced induction are all viable options. There are several excellent kits on the market to chose from; it most important to remember then the best system is the one that will accomplish your specific goals.
mines13 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mines13 For This Useful Post:
djdnz (06-13-2013), Maximania (06-18-2013), Opposed (06-13-2013), PrDarkKnight (06-14-2013), swift996 (06-13-2013), whataboutbob (06-13-2013)