Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Northwest (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Oregon to test pay-per-mile idea as replacement for gas tax (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=88686)

Tromatic 05-20-2015 02:39 PM

Oregon to test pay-per-mile idea as replacement for gas tax
 
You know that if this goes to a vote it would pass thanks to the greentards in PDX. And if you think it would stay at 1.5 your are not just nuts, you are stupid.

Oregon to test pay-per-mile idea as replacement for gas tax

May 20, 2:17 AM (ET)

By GOSIA WOZNIACKA



PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Oregon is about to embark on a first-in-the-nation program that aims to charge car owners not for the fuel they use, but for the miles they drive.


The program is meant to help the state raise more revenue to pay for road and bridge projects at a time when money generated from gasoline taxes are declining across the country, in part, because of greater fuel efficiency and the increasing popularity of fuel-efficient, hybrid and electric cars.


Starting July 1, up to 5,000 volunteers in Oregon can sign up to drive with devices that collect data on how much they have driven and where. The volunteers will agree to pay 1.5 cents for each mile traveled on public roads within Oregon, instead of the tax now added when filling up at the pump.

gramicci101 05-20-2015 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Article
Starting July 1, up to 5,000 volunteers in Oregon can sign up to drive with devices that collect data on how much they have driven and where.

Oh that's a great idea. Nothing could possibly go wrong with that.

EAGLE5 05-20-2015 02:49 PM

If I lived in Oregon and drove a vehicle that got less than 15mpg, I'd totally for it. I don't live in Oregon, and the only time a vehicle I've owned has ever gotten less than 15mpg is at the track. So no thanks.

Tromatic 05-20-2015 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gramicci101 (Post 2256124)
Oh that's a great idea. Nothing could possibly go wrong with that.

"After the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon raised concerns about privacy and government surveillance, the state built protections into the program, said ACLU's interim executive director Jann Carson.

Drivers will be able to install an odometer device without GPS tracking."

Will not comply, even if it means I have to leave this f-ing state.

wrohdejr 05-20-2015 05:05 PM

No way i am going to let them in my garage to install this on my car!

Decay107 05-20-2015 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tromatic (Post 2256137)
"After the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon raised concerns about privacy and government surveillance, the state built protections into the program, said ACLU's interim executive director Jann Carson.

Drivers will be able to install an odometer device without GPS tracking."

Will not comply, even if it means I have to leave this f-ing state.

:word:

thehapaone 05-20-2015 05:30 PM

I'm crafty enough to just disconnect the thing...that is if they somehow manage to put it on in the first place

RobertPaulson 05-20-2015 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gramicci101 (Post 2256124)
Oh that's a great idea. Nothing could possibly go wrong with that.

its the same thing as the ones insurance companies use, it tracks where you turn the car on and where it turns off, how many miles driven, acceleration/braking events, and nothing else in between.

however if they're going to charge me per mile vs per gallong of fuel i'm moving next to work, buying a 454 chevelle ss and chug fuel at 4mpg while driving a mile or two.

Tromatic 05-20-2015 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobertPaulson (Post 2256402)
its the same thing as the ones insurance companies use, it tracks where you turn the car on and where it turns off, how many miles driven, acceleration/braking events, and nothing else in between.

however if they're going to charge me per mile vs per gallong of fuel i'm moving next to work, buying a 454 chevelle ss and chug fuel at 4mpg while driving a mile or two.

Or a communal gas-getter with a 100 gallon tank that gets driven 50 miles a year.

Tromatic 05-20-2015 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Decay107 (Post 2256391)
:word:

Don't understand the emoticon.

Decay107 05-20-2015 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tromatic (Post 2256437)
Don't understand the emoticon.

Word.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Word

Tromatic 05-20-2015 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thehapaone (Post 2256395)
I'm crafty enough to just disconnect the thing...that is if they somehow manage to put it on in the first place

You don't think the nanny-state would let you get away with that, do you? Somewhere is the final bill would be a requirement for you to "allow" the state to compare your vehicle odo to theirs yearly, or whenever they damn well please.

thehapaone 05-20-2015 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tromatic (Post 2256443)
You don't think the nanny-state would let you get away with that, do you? Somewhere is the final bill would be a requirement for you to "allow" the state to compare your vehicle odo to theirs yearly, or whenever they damn well please.

I'd also gladly leave this state are move to a less idiotic one if they end up deciding this is a good idea

Tromatic 05-20-2015 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thehapaone (Post 2256395)
I'm crafty enough to just disconnect the thing...that is if they somehow manage to put it on in the first place

You don't think the nanny-state would let you get away with that, do you? Somewhere is the final bill would be a requirement for you to "allow" the state to compare your vehicle odo to theirs yearly, or whenever they damn well please.

soulreapersteve 05-20-2015 06:29 PM

I don't live in Oregon and even I am hoping this does not pass. If it does, someone over here in Seattle will try to do the same.

Btw, what about people who have to travel long distances for work? Apologies as I only know what was posted here. :)

Tromatic 05-20-2015 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soulreapersteve (Post 2256498)
Btw, what about people who have to travel long distances for work? Apologies as I only know what was posted here. :)

Be interesting to see, being that the Democrats are such champions of the little people.

RobertPaulson 05-20-2015 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soulreapersteve (Post 2256498)
I don't live in Oregon and even I am hoping this does not pass. If it does, someone over here in Seattle will try to do the same.

Btw, what about people who have to travel long distances for work? Apologies as I only know what was posted here. :)

they, and I, better get the lube ready

m.box.design 05-20-2015 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soulreapersteve (Post 2256498)
I don't live in Oregon and even I am hoping this does not pass. If it does, someone over here in Seattle will try to do the same.

Btw, what about people who have to travel long distances for work? Apologies as I only know what was posted here. :)

Article mentions WA already setting money aside for a similar program.

soulreapersteve 05-20-2015 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by indesign (Post 2256540)
Article mentions WA already setting money aside for a similar program.

In this case, I really hope this does not pass - in Oregon or anywhere else in the country....

gtslow 05-20-2015 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soulreapersteve (Post 2256568)
In this case, I really hope this does not pass - in Oregon or anywhere else in the country....

Something along these lines is coming. As cars get more efficient and more people adopt electric vehicles the gas tax revenue will continue to go down. The government needs to pay for road maintenance and this is the straw they have grasped onto.

The WA state proposal has an option to pay a set amount based on your odometer, but if you travel out of state you would end up paying more than the nanny state device.

Toyarzee 05-20-2015 08:14 PM

If the future holds such rediculous concepts such as our relinquishing ownership rights to our vehicle purchases, reduced to licensing use for the life of the vehicle along with this new idea of tracking every mile I travel, I'm taking the fucking bus to work until I find a home elsewhere.

There are far less intrusive taxation concepts already in practice. Who would have thought that if they continue to stack taxes on gasoline that people would respond and reduce fuel consumption?

gtslow 05-20-2015 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toyarzee (Post 2256620)
If the future holds such rediculous concepts such as our relinquishing ownership rights to our vehicle purchases, reduced to licensing use for the life of the vehicle along with this new idea of tracking every mile I travel, I'm taking the fucking bus to work until I find a home elsewhere.

There are far less intrusive taxation concepts already in practice. Who would have thought that if they continue to stack taxes on gasoline that people would respond and reduce fuel consumption?

We could always go the model of other countries and states and heavily toll the roads people use for commuting.

jblmr2 05-20-2015 10:01 PM

Don't want to be a wet blanket, but if we want decent roads we have to pay for them. Just because cars are more fuel efficient doesn't reduce the wear and tear on the roads. So you can pay for it in repairs to your vehicle or taxes to fix the roads, your choice.

Tromatic 05-20-2015 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jblmr2 (Post 2256729)
Don't want to be a wet blanket, but if we want decent roads we have to pay for them. Just because cars are more fuel efficient doesn't reduce the wear and tear on the roads. So you can pay for it in repairs to your vehicle or taxes to fix the roads, your choice.

Nobody is complaining about a gas tax. I'd be willing to pay more if roads was where it all went. I REFUSE to let the state of Oregon put a nanny in my car. Which means I probably need to plan on moving.

llawd 05-20-2015 11:24 PM

It's a pilot project. Looking for volunteers...

People panicking like it's F-ing mandatory.

gtslow 05-20-2015 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tromatic (Post 2256794)
Nobody is complaining about a gas tax. I'd be willing to pay more if roads was where it all went. I REFUSE to let the state of Oregon put a nanny in my car. Which means I probably need to plan on moving.

Texas is calling ;-)

gramicci101 05-20-2015 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by llawd (Post 2256804)
It's a pilot project. Looking for volunteers...

People panicking like it's F-ing mandatory.

The best way to respond to something like this is when it's in its infancy and you can still effect change. Once it gets established it's much harder to get rid of.

Tromatic 05-20-2015 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by llawd (Post 2256804)
It's a pilot project. Looking for volunteers...

People panicking like it's F-ing mandatory.

You don't watch the shitheads in Salem much, do you.

llawd 05-21-2015 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tromatic (Post 2256818)
You don't watch the shitheads in Salem much, do you.

You have no clue what I do or don't watch.

I'm betting it won't be mandatory anytime soon. It's failing now as a pilot project -- they can't get people to sign up.
And there would be massive backlash from all sides if the shitheads tried to do so.
But if there is a better way to get the prius, leaf, tesla etc drivers to pay their share, I'm sure they would like to hear about it.

Tromatic 05-21-2015 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by llawd (Post 2256850)
You have no clue what I do or don't watch.

I'm betting it won't be mandatory anytime soon. It's failing now as a pilot project -- they can't get people to sign up.
And there would be massive backlash from all sides if the shitheads tried to do so.
But if there is a better way to get the prius, leaf, tesla etc drivers to pay their share, I'm sure they would like to hear about it.

What state agency do you work for? Easy, tax them annually at an average rate, or allow THEM to tell the state how much they drove. Keep your garbage out of my car. Sound Democrat thinking, though. We need to address a small number of people, so lets come up with something that sucks, is intrusive and fucks everyone. Perhaps they used the ACA as an example.

Been using the calculator here. According to them, if I do my best do drive my mileage as low as I can with E85 I will pay less than I do now in gas tax. I can use an eco-disaster fuel which costs less and pay less in taxes. Win all the way around.

OurFirst86 05-22-2015 12:17 AM

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Oregon is about to embark on a first-in-the-nation program that aims to charge car owners not for the fuel they use, but for the miles they drive.



Are they stupid cause any business like seaside for touris or any vacation spot will go out of business!!! No No No!! :barf:

gtslow 05-22-2015 01:28 AM

I wonder how much revenue they lose from people that either register their cars out of state or are legitimately traveling through. I'm sure all the folks in Vancouver, WA will be filling up their gas tanks as well as the trunks of their SUV's in Oregon.

RobertPaulson 05-22-2015 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jblmr2 (Post 2256729)
Don't want to be a wet blanket, but if we want decent roads we have to pay for them. Just because cars are more fuel efficient doesn't reduce the wear and tear on the roads. So you can pay for it in repairs to your vehicle or taxes to fix the roads, your choice.

lets start by banning studded tires, those do more damage to the roads than anything else. NOBODY NEEDS FUCKING STUDDED WINTER TIRES IN THIS STATE, not even on the other side of the mountains.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gtslow (Post 2258262)
I wonder how much revenue they lose from people that either register their cars out of state or are legitimately traveling through. I'm sure all the folks in Vancouver, WA will be filling up their gas tanks as well as the trunks of their SUV's in Oregon.

I know i would.

Decay107 05-22-2015 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobertPaulson (Post 2258731)
lets start by banning studded tires, those do more damage to the roads than anything else. NOBODY NEEDS FUCKING STUDDED WINTER TIRES IN THIS STATE, not even on the other side of the mountains...

Amen.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.