Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   K&N Drop-In Filter (Quick Impressions) (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8792)

Toma 07-03-2013 04:56 PM

I had a dirt track car many years ago and with KN we would always find oily dirt in the carburetor mouth. Their claim to why they even filter with such big pores is that the gauze fibers vibrate with airflow and filter better than with static flow.

But I digress. Dyno tested a drop in kn filter in an frs and there was zero difference anywhere. Hell. We are averaging 1 to 2 hp with entire cold air kits which is hard to see with normal run to run variance.

Fast_Freddy 07-03-2013 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toma (Post 1043458)
I had a dirt track car many years ago and with KN we would always find oily dirt in the carburetor mouth. Their claim to why they even filter with such big pores is that the gauze fibers vibrate with airflow and filter better than with static flow.

But I digress. Dyno tested a drop in kn filter in an frs and there was zero difference anywhere. Hell. We are averaging 1 to 2 hp with entire cold air kits which is hard to see with normal run to run variance.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13245

^ +5whp gains for drop-in filters. ^

I don't know what to believe anymore. I've been seeing and hearing the same pro/con arguments for 20+ years now and still no concensus. You won't sell many drop-in filters if they don't add something so the motivation to produce positive results is certainly there. It wouldn't be hard to provide slightly more favorable test conditions, even unintentionally.

Still, in theory there should be some slight improvement in VE by reducing the airflow resistance of the filter and it is well known that oiled cotton gauze has lower resistance than oem paper. OTOH OCG also allows more dirt to pass so there really is no free lunch here. In the end I went with K&N hoping that they know the correct balance between increased airflow and filtration efficiency.

Toma 07-03-2013 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy (Post 1043520)
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13245

^ +5whp gains for drop-in filters. ^

I don't know what to believe anymore. I've been seeing and hearing the same pro/con arguments for 20+ years now and still no concensus. You won't sell many drop-in filters if they don't add something so the motivation to produce positive results is certainly there. It wouldn't be hard to provide slightly more favorable test conditions, even unintentionally.

Still, in theory there should be some slight improvement in VE by reducing the airflow resistance of the filter and it is well known that oiled cotton gauze has lower resistance than oem paper. OTOH OCG also allows more dirt to pass so there really is no free lunch here. In the end I went with K&N hoping that they know the correct balance between increased airflow and filtration efficiency.

They did something wrong if they saw any power gain with a drop in. I don't sell product. I just dyno tune and test. Tested it. Zero. Back to back.

If anyone wants to send me something to test.... id be happy to.

If you wanna see if your filter is the restriction its pretty easy without a dyno. Go on ebay and buy a magnehelic pressure gauge or differential pressure gauge. Something in the 8 to 15 inch of water range and map your induction system.

Tomzilla 07-17-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bristecom (Post 1043422)
Yeah, well I found out about them back in 2004/2005 when they were used in every WRC car engine. If you compare them side by side, you will definitely see the quality difference between the two. Green is the only one that has filter area that goes to the edge and the panel is usually narrower than K&N due to their rubber molding technology. Plus, they are the same price or cheaper. My filter has held up great for the past 6 years and it made a noticeable gain in power/response in both our cars so I've been happy with them.

BMC has more prestige than any other since they are used in race winning F1 cars, Le Mans/GT cars, MotoGP bikes, etc, but I still think Green has a slight edge in quality.


Just ordered a green, will post a quickie on how I like it. :)

radroach 08-03-2013 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EZWood (Post 263126)
Hope you guys buying this filter like dust going into your engine, and reduced filtering capacity. Have a nice day.

Not everyone lives in the desert

reesmicm 08-03-2013 01:49 PM

Just replaced my filter with a K&N, from previous history with Harleys, it's an easy couple horsepower increase for 5 minutes of work.

Looking at the original FR-S filter it's hard to believe it could breath at all. Looked more like a dust filter for the inside of the car.

zooki 08-03-2013 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy (Post 1043150)
I really wanted a aFe Proguard 7 or AEM Dryflow but they don't make them for us.

I've had an AEM Dryflow in my car for almost a year. They make them.

enwave 08-03-2013 07:34 PM

Just another warning: had an over-oiled K&N and it was spitting back -- had to have it cleaned out and wiped off. Make sure you wipe yours a little before you drop it in otherwise you'll get a nice pretty CEL ;)

xjohnx 08-03-2013 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enwave (Post 1116267)
Just another warning: had an over-oiled K&N and it was spitting back -- had to have it cleaned out and wiped off. Make sure you wipe yours a little before you drop it in otherwise you'll get a nice pretty CEL ;)

might be worth cleaning your MAF sensor if that happened to you. Just remove the MAF sensor and spray it down with some CRC MAF cleaner.

enwave 08-03-2013 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xjohnx (Post 1116274)
might be worth cleaning your MAF sensor if that happened to you. Just remove the MAF sensor and spray it down with some CRC MAF cleaner.

Yep, that was part of the cleaning process. Headache, shoulda just wiped it from the beginning! :bonk:

Fast_Freddy 08-04-2013 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zooki (Post 1115867)
I've had an AEM Dryflow in my car for almost a year. They make them.

Drop in??? I know they make universal filters.

zooki 08-04-2013 10:49 AM

Sorry, I meant aFe Pro Dry filter. AEM, aFE, I got confused. Anyway, this is the one I went with:
http://www.autoanything.com/air-filt...A4151A0A0.aspx

Jfheisenberg 03-24-2015 01:49 PM

I just installed the k&n drop in air filter during my lunch break, and the first thing i notice it that definitely there is louder. I can hear the air intake when when reving 4-5k + rpm.. I still need to drive it more to see if there is any noticeable throttle response

Jfheisenberg 03-25-2015 09:54 AM

After driving the car car for a while with the new k&n drop in filter, i can say that it does improve throttle response a little bit. Its more noticeable around 5k +

Worth the 50$ IMO..


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.