![]() |
US Owners: Tune While You Still Can!!
Apologies for the overly-dramatic thread title, but our ability in the US to tune our ECUs could be going away soon due to Auto makers pushing for stricter copyright laws in the USA regarding ECU programming.
http://www.autoblog.com/2015/04/20/a...s-car-repairs/ Personally, I don't think this will end up becoming a real law (and I really hope not). I understand the motivation for their proposed changes, but at the same time its very transparent that this is about profits, not safety or legal liability. |
Apple couldn't stop people from jailbreaking iphones.
No way in hell automakers are going to keep people from modifying cars. |
Quote:
|
|
Hey, I posted it first! I can't help that I posted it in the wrong section! :lol:
EDIT: Well, at least this thread hasn't turned into a political discussion shitstorm. That, and I'm totally convinced at this point that certain members of this form (such as the OP of the other thread), are just curmudgeonly old men who just want to yell at "those damn kids" to "Get off my lawn!" while not willing to actually do anything about it. |
Quote:
Not like you were posting yet another "the new BRZ is confirmed" or "let's all talk about how beautiful or car is" thread! Oh Oh or another "use this gas for no crickets" one! |
Quote:
|
Very disturbing trend of not being able to do what I want with my own property.
EULAs don't hold up in court so I guess now they're trying to make it law? |
**In for the thread that doesn't suggest hanging people from trees.**
While I respect companies wanting to protect what they create, I really don't think laws like what's being proposed are going to stop anyone, all it will do in the end is make criminals out of the lot of us. Enthusiasts of any type are going to do whatever they damn well please with the products they buy. Look at all the other modifications that are not legal that we do to our cars anyway: Tint, FI, ride height, smoked lights, exhaust, etc. When something like this becomes illegal, then people go to back alley dealings and end up with a product (tune) that could be potentially unsafe simply because they are no longer publicly published, documented, tested, and critiqued. |
Quote:
|
I can understand the intellectual property issue.
And I have always wondered if (or when) Toybaru was going to crack down on exchanging ROMs online, but luckily they havent yet. One way that they could make it illegal to even reverse engineer the ROMs would be to encrypt the ROM. Then decrypting it would be a violation of the DMCA and they wouldnt need any new laws in the US. |
Quote:
Piggyback chips might squeak in under the law, because they don't modify the ECU itself, only the signals coming in and out of the ECU. But they're not as flexible or user-friendly as the two listed above. A standalone ECU such as MOTEC or Hydra EMS bypasses the law completely, but that's a much higher price tag and is much more complicated for basic users who just want a stage 1 or 2 reflash and maybe launch control. Look at tuning solutions for the Toyota Tundra. There are a few piggyback chips that are iffy on what you get, and there are complete ECU swaps. There is no middle ground, because the ECU is so tightly locked down. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
As I mentioned in the other thread, this is only an issue for those flashing the stock ECU.
While I see this as an issue for future owners, I don't think this is an issue for current owners as there is nothing in current ownership materials that states "ECU code is used under license from (insert random auto maker here)" To get to the point of banning owners from tuning, they'd have to have our consent and agreement that the ECU code is used under a license and not under an ownership. -alex |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.