![]() |
16x6.5" vs 17x9" (light weight vs grip)
How's it going guys, I am currently on the fence for my summer / track day set up.
There's a set of BBS forged rims I am considering that are 16x6.5" supposedly 13.5 lbs. On the opposite end of the spectrum I am also considering 17x9" 720Form GTF1. Assuming both of which will have the same rubber mounted 16" - 205/55-16 17" - 245/40-17 Which will handle better? Lightweight set up or more rubber? |
Heres a little article if you haven't read it yet... http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-cult...ransformation/
|
A 55 series tire is going to have a softer sidewall and won't have as good of feel or turn in. You'll probably need more camber (especially up front) as well.
IMO, go 17x8 with 225/45's. |
A 17x9 RPF1 is 15.9lbs. I really doubt you're going to be faster by saving 2.4lbs on each corner. You're sacrificing a lot of mechanical grip going from 245 to 205.
It depends on how you define handle better. Better lap times? More rubber will generally give you better lap times. |
If you go to 16x7 instead of 16x6.5 you can use 225/50 instead of 205/55.
Depends if you want to over-tyre the car which will make you faster or keep the fun character of the car which will help you improve your driving. |
|
Aside from some ugly looking XXR wheels I'm having a hard time finding a set of wheels that are 16x8 with the proper offset for stock suspension. Any suggestions?
|
Doesn't really matter if your driving skill can't take advantage of either setup.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Basically, there aren't any, at least not in the 'affordable' category. I've been trying to find what you're looking for for close to a year now. ESM has a 16x8 in +35, but it weighs a ton and is ugly. The next closest thing would be the Enkei Compe in 16x8 +25, which is just a little too aggressivein offset for my taste, and aren't really worth the trouble at ~18 pounds. The RPF1 is available in 16x8 5x100 +35, but is like hen's teeth, and you'll be paying $250+ per wheel. I stumbled across some like-new Motegi Traklites (16x7 +40) with 225/50 Ecsta XS on them for $1200, which is a comparative bargain considering they're close to $300/wheel new, and they're 12.5 pounds each. They aren't really quite the look I was going for, but price and functionality outweighs (or in this case, weighs less than...lol) form. |
Thanks for your feedback. How was the driving feel compared to your stock setup? Any suspension modification?
|
Quote:
Dunno yet - I just bought them recently and won't have them on the car for another couple of weeks, as I'm still on winters (16x6.5 +50 steels and 205/55 Conti WinterExtremes). Everything else on the car is stock (camber bolts and an alignment are planned for next week), so I'm expecting the taller sidewall to give a better ride over the lousy roads here, plus it will work better with the relatively long travel OEM suspension than say a 245/40-17 would, in terms of keeping the tire oriented optimally to the ground. |
I've seen a set of 16x8 5x100 TE37 on yahoo auction japan.
|
I have the Wedssport SA15R in the 16x7 with a Continental Extreme Contact DW 225/50/16 on my automatic FR-S. The rim weighs 14.8 lbs or so, the tire is approximately 21lbs. The car ws smoother on the road and handled much better. According to tire rack the 225/50 is the size they recommend for a 16x7. I like the way this rim looked and the price was quite affordable.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.