![]() |
17x9 +35 or +30?
Looking into getting Rota Grids 17×9 and it comes as +35 or +30.
I want a pokey or flush look, but it looks like the +35 might be sunk still in the rear, but pokes in front. Will running a 17x9 +30 cause rubbing in front since +35 already pokes? Anyone with pics or advice of 17×9 +30 would help greatly! |
I had 17x9 +35 not too long ago and it was flush in the rear, poked out a little in the front.
|
+35
|
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...=64040&page=12
Go to post #254 for photos of my 17x9 +35 wheels. Fyi, -2 camber in rear, zero camber up front in the pics. I have a little negative camber now up front, and they look very similar to the rear as far as poke is concerned. |
Quote:
|
+35. for flushness.
+30 is better if you are running 17x8 imho. |
No rubbing at all. Stock struts with Eibach pro
|
I have 17x9 +35's, the rears fit in just perfectly. The front poked slightly before alignment, now that i have -1.75 camber they tuck in just right too. my car is not as low as many others, though (RCE Yellows)
|
17 x 9 +35 will fit on stock but poke in the front. non stock suspension it is close to flush with a little camber in the front.
|
I say run +35 in front and +30 in rear.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.