![]() |
Quote:
|
On a series note, I would look for mid-late 2013 or later as they have all the important ECU updates, especially timing pull in the upper ranges that lead to premature failure in then direct injection seals.
You can see the build date on the metal tab bolted to the passenger door well beside the door latch. |
Quote:
It's just like that time your grandparents sent you those embarrassing pajamas... http://www.jeancocteaucinema.com/wp-...mas-story1.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So for these any cars built in 2012 up to about April 2013 are the "suspect" ones. If all the TSBs were done there should be no problems with them though. There are also plenty of guys that never had a single issue even with the first run ones. If these things worry you then stick to late 13s and up. This of course is still no 100% guarantee that you won't have a problem because things can still go wrong with any new car. |
Quote:
I even tried the old "Those won't work on my rims" thing and almost pulled it off but my ever so helpful son in law goes out and puts them on and says "sure they do". Actually, the picture doesn't do them justice as in real life they don't look bad and have sort of grown on me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am enjoy my RS 1.0's yellow color, DRL headlights, and aero kit very much. It was much more expensive, but did I mention I really like yellow? |
I was asking myself the same question a few months ago when I was ready to make my purchase. I narrowed it down to a brand new 2013 Whiteout FR-S for 22,500 OTD or a 2015 Halo FR-S for $27,400 OTD. I ended up dropping the extra 5 grand for several reasons:
1) The 2013 was in New Jersey and I'm in Orlando....meaning it would have to be shipped here. The dealer said they would be using a third party shipper which I already didn't trust and that I would have to pay extra to have it shipped in a closed container. I didn't want to risk anything happening to the car on the way here. 2) Most of the 2013's left have been sitting on the lot for over 3 years now (since the end of 2012). I don't like the idea of that....I have no evidence as to if sitting that long causes any harm to the components, but I'd like to think SOMETHING might start rotting in there. 3) The 2013 has been test driven many times....had over 300 miles on it. At that point it was more of a used car to me. I'm pretty sure the salespeople over there have dogged it out as well. In summary, if you can find a clean, local 2013 with low miles and you're on a budget, I'd go for that. But if you want to drop a few more grand for the peace of mind knowing that your new car is actually a NEW car (freshly manufactured), then I'd go for that. Good luck. |
;) buy a 2015 if it fits your budget....that's my 2 cents....have peace of mind that you got a brand spanking new car! I was offered to buy a 2014 but it was the demo car. Price difference between new and used was a small amount. So I got the 2015 and never looked back. :D
|
Found a 2013 used with 9k miles on it. Manufactured in June 2013 for 18k. Great deal?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
You may already know all this stuff but just in case: If you look at it in person check the engine cover bolts and see if they are all marked up or there are misplaced washer indents in the cover's tabs. This will let you know if it has been on and off a pile. Same thing with the exhaust fasteners just look and see if they are beat up. These things can tell you if there were any mods on the car which may have caused some premature wear. Also ask if the service records show any of the TSBs being done and confirm if the maintenance was done on schedule. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.