Quote:
Originally Posted by Poodles
(Post 1989078)
Yes, because the engine swap puts them in the class that full on super cars or pure race cars are in.
You answered your own question...
|
Link me to exactly what you're talking about with proof. The biggest time attack event in the world just happened over the last two days in Australia, and the highest class is Pro class. Club Sprint class allows engine swaps, but not cross-manufacturer engine swaps. So, that explains why you don't see LSx swaps there, but the Pro class does not have that same rule. These guys are spending insane amounts of money on one goal, to be the fastest around these tracks, and they are not using LSx engines. They are using light, built small displacement engines with huge turbos and setting world records.
I actually can't think of any LSx swapped cars setting records in the U.S. either. There are fast turbo/supercharged s2000s, fast turbo NSXs, etc. with records..... and there are some fast Corvettes holding records too (they tend to do well on less tight tracks though, due to size & weight), but I can't think of any light FR chassis cars with LSx stuffed into them doing well outside of drifting/drag racing. The NSX is an exception to the light, small displacement trend, because it has amazing handling and stability with the mid-engine layout.
It doesn't seem to be about restrictions. It seems to be about weight, balance, and traction.
If anybody has examples of where I am wrong, I would like to hear them though! I have considered putting an LS1 or LS3 in my 240sx several times, but decided against it since I am more into grip driving than drifting or drag.
EDIT: The top 5, by the way, were:
An Evo, an S15, an S13, an S2000, and an RX7......... all with turbo'd small displacement engines. (These cars finished way ahead of all of the cars in the Nissan GTR class, btw.)