Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Software Tuning (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   OpenFlash Tablet: OTS v2.0 Beta (132 new maps, 12 new XMLs) Available for Download (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70796)

steve99 07-27-2014 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jrdad (Post 1868089)
@Shiv@Openflash will there be a table to adjust the cold start idle, preferably with the excessive valve overlap on initial start?

The tables are defined you just need to alter them

http://i.imgur.com/ZBR0Bl6.jpg

post here by @troek

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...&postcount=108

Jrdad 07-27-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve99 (Post 1868099)
The tables are defined you just need to alter them

http://i.imgur.com/ZBR0Bl6.jpg

post here by @troek

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...&postcount=108

I don't have either maf correction after start table

steve99 07-27-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jrdad (Post 1868135)
I don't have either maf correction after start table

Just chage the cold start idle and ignition retard as per troek post if you have tose tables if not your out of luck, those tables may only be in the non oft definitions

355rockit 07-27-2014 04:37 PM

Did a 100 mile drive today with the car club today with v2.0 of the Stage 2 UEL tune. Less torquey off the line, but I am happier since it is easier to modulate. Power comes on smoother. One big plus is my mileage is better with the 2.0 OTS vs. 1.59 OTS tune.

themajesticone 07-27-2014 04:48 PM

Tried to do a couple pulls last night - going to try and get another run in tonight. Here is my log, how is it looking?

http://datazap.me/u/themajesticone/a...0?log=0&data=1

edeekeos 07-27-2014 04:59 PM

@Shiv@Openflash

Re-downloaded and re-flashed the new 2.0 tune, and now everything is GOLDEN, really not sure what was going on before. The tune feels great, FT's and AFR are beautiful. This tune feels MUCH smoother than the 1.59. Also, LC is really nice, glad to finally have that available, now to get to the next test and tune at the track. Overall, very happy with this rendition, great work, as always!

nunonuna 07-27-2014 05:39 PM

Just reflashed 2.0 stage 1. 93 oct.
After I reflashed my CAL ID changed to B01C on OFT. OFM still shows A01C as it used to be.
Is that normal?? I did use correct file to flash it which is stg 1 A01C.bin
And all labels of data logging are gone also.

Malt 07-27-2014 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nunonuna (Post 1868225)
Just reflashed 2.0 stage 1. 93 oct.
After I reflashed my CAL ID changed to B01C on OFT. OFM still shows A01C as it used to be.
Is that normal?? I did use correct file to flash it which is stg 1 A01C.bin
And all labels of data logging are gone also.

Entirely normal, just like other CalID's other than A01C before the v2.0 maps (ie 700C, A00C, B00C, etc...) listed A01C there, your A01C will now list the base map in which the new maps are based on (which is B01C). The OFT will not let you flash the wrong map to your ECU.

Shiv@Openflash 07-27-2014 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nunonuna (Post 1868225)
Just reflashed 2.0 stage 1. 93 oct.
After I reflashed my CAL ID changed to B01C on OFT. OFM still shows A01C as it used to be.
Is that normal?? I did use correct file to flash it which is stg 1 A01C.bin
And all labels of data logging are gone also.

After flashing your ecu, disconnect it and plug it in again before going to realtime data display. The text will re-appear. Just a small bug with the 1.27 firmware that will be fixed in the next fw update.

lucid215 07-27-2014 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by edeekeos (Post 1868178)
@Shiv@Openflash

Re-downloaded and re-flashed the new 2.0 tune, and now everything is GOLDEN, really not sure what was going on before. The tune feels great, FT's and AFR are beautiful. This tune feels MUCH smoother than the 1.59. Also, LC is really nice, glad to finally have that available, now to get to the next test and tune at the track. Overall, very happy with this rendition, great work, as always!


I wonder if you accidentally uploaded the stage 2 esc rom. I know shiv accidentally uploaded those to the site but was fixed the next day

Andrew025 07-27-2014 07:17 PM

What fuel is recommended for the roms in the folders that don't have an octane number?

Shiv@Openflash 07-27-2014 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucid215 (Post 1868326)
I wonder if you accidentally uploaded the stage 2 esc rom. I know shiv accidentally uploaded those to the site but was fixed the next day

The ESC maps will work just fine on a non-ESC'd car so I don't think that was the problem.

Readytoxplod 07-27-2014 08:02 PM

@Shiv@Openflash
Completely new to this and I don't know how to get the new OFT 2.0 files downloaded into my car.
I want to upgrade to stage 1 93, can someone help? I opened Open Flash Manager 1.10 and went to "Upload," and under components "Original File" says "not present" along with the other "Modified #1-5."
-I then tried to select a file for modified #1 and went in my downloads "stage 1 93 oct" folder and selected "Stg1 B01C.bin" from the folder to upload. I then received an error message stating "The file selected is not compliant"
Can anyone help?

Shiv@Openflash 07-27-2014 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readytoxplod (Post 1868379)
@Shiv@Openflash
Completely new to this and I don't know how to get the new OFT 2.0 files downloaded into my car.
I want to upgrade to stage 1 93, can someone help? I opened Open Flash Manager 1.10 and went to "Upload," and under components "Original File" says "not present" along with the other "Modified #1-5."
-I then tried to select a file for modified #1 and went in my downloads "stage 1 93 oct" folder and selected "Stg1 B01C.bin" from the folder to upload. I then received an error message stating "The file selected is not compliant"
Can anyone help?

If your original file is "not present" then it looks like you never installed the OFT properly. It needs to read your ECU before you can do anything else. There is a video on the front page of www.openflashtablet.com showing this process in detail.

Readytoxplod 07-27-2014 08:16 PM

ahh it says "error 0x69 while communicating with device"
I reconnected my tablet and the error is gone.

I also checked my ROM and it includes "A00C," I then uploaded the stage 1 93 A00c.bin file. Thanks shiv!

Shiv@Openflash 07-27-2014 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readytoxplod (Post 1868392)
ahh it says "error 0x69 while communicating with device"
I reconnected my tablet and the error is gone.

I also checked my ROM and it includes "A00C," I then uploaded the stage 1 93 A00c.bin file. Thanks shiv!

:party0030:

Now go for a nice Sunday drive!

tonystewart 07-27-2014 09:27 PM

Good evening Shiv
I sent you an email about my custom tune, will I be able to gain the benefit of this new 2.01 tune?
Thank you

FingR-S 07-27-2014 09:50 PM

Shiv, I loaded the 2.0 Stage 1 91 Oct tune and everything is working great - as reported by others: smoother acceleration = I would say more linear response than the 1.59 tune. I still have to give another 40 miles or so to get the full effect.

Question: (I've only done this once before)
The files all look the same in their respective folders for example:
In the OTS v2.0 Beta folder/stage 1/Stg 1 700C, the "Stg 1 700C" file looks the same as the "Stage 91oct" folder file called the same "Stg 1 700C"
I want to make sure that I'm viewing the files correctly.
All the maps I uploaded to the OFT look the same "Stg 1 700C".
I went by (remembered) what slot I uploaded them too - 1.59 is in the first slot, 2.0 in the second, and 93oct tune in the third slot - all have the same file name - is this normal?

Since I don't have to reload the 2.01 maps, is there a link to loading the correct XML files - never done it - to get launch control to work etc?
Thank you for all the great work on these tunes!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FrsDuke 07-27-2014 09:56 PM

You can rename the files on your pc before loading them to make it more clear.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FingR-S (Post 1868511)
Shiv, I loaded the 2.0 Stage 1 91 Oct tune and everything is working great - as reported by others: smoother acceleration = I would say more linear response than the 1.59 tune. I still have to give another 40 miles or so to get the full effect.

Question: (I've only done this once before)
The files all look the same in their respective folders for example:
In the OTS v2.0 Beta folder/stage 1/Stg 1 700C, the "Stg 1 700C" file looks the same as the "Stage 91oct" folder file called the same "Stg 1 700C"
I want to make sure that I'm viewing the files correctly.
All the maps I uploaded to the OFT look the same "Stg 1 700C".
I went by (remembered) what slot I uploaded them too - 1.59 is in the first slot, 2.0 in the second, and 93oct tune in the third slot - all have the same file name - is this normal?

Since I don't have to reload the 2.01 maps, is there a link to loading the correct XML files - never done it - to get launch control to work etc?
Thank you for all the great work on these tunes!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


FingR-S 07-27-2014 10:55 PM

That's easy - wasn't sure that was ok. Thanks FrsDuke!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wparsons 07-27-2014 10:57 PM

^^ This, I rename all mine so it's clear as well.

Put some km's on the stage 1 93 octane tune, noticed something unexpected... even though I filled up with 1/4 tank of 91 left (so not a full tank of 94 octane), I'm getting WAY less mid range knock under load (I always get enough knock when stuck in traffic on the 91 octane tune running 91 octane to drop the IAM down to like 0.5 all the time), with the 93 octane tune the IAM stayed at 1.0 even stuck in traffic with the AC on.

Beyond that, it definitely feels a few hp stronger across the rpm range.

xxBrun0xx 07-27-2014 11:08 PM

Does the 93 stage 1 change anything other than another HP/tq curves? Eg idle speed, Rev limit, pedal position map, etc? Just curious if some of the changes people are noticing are plecebo?

Apoc 07-27-2014 11:56 PM

@shiv I started getting P0170 CELs when idling today so I flashed back to stock. My exhaust has been backfiring and has been louder the last couple days so I checked my gaskets and made sure my OFH was wasn't leaky. I had to replace the gasket at the OP/FP. Now this P0170 code leads me to suspect that I have a bad MAF sensor and my fuel trims are getting messed up.:(

steve99 07-28-2014 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apoc (Post 1868685)
@shiv I started getting P0170 CELs when idling today so I flashed back to stock. My exhaust has been backfiring and has been louder the last couple days so I checked my gaskets and made sure my OFH was wasn't leaky. I had to replace the gasket at the OP/FP. Now this P0170 code leads me to suspect that I have a bad MAF sensor and my fuel trims are getting messed up.:(

stock intake ?
check for vacuum leaks especially gasket at maf sensor and clamp at throttlebody and vacuum hoses on intake manifold sound tube ect
if oiled filter chech and clean maf sensor

Apoc 07-28-2014 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve99 (Post 1868738)
stock intake ?
check for vacuum leaks especially gasket at maf sensor and clamp at throttlebody and vacuum hoses on intake manifold sound tube ect
if oiled filter chech and clean maf sensor

I have a TRD intake and did take the MAF sensor out and gave it a good shot with connector cleaner. I will check clamps and hoses tomorrow. I was going to take in to the dealership but now I think I will avoid the frustration and expense and fix it myself.

Brinks 07-28-2014 02:14 AM

Just got my OFT, trying to upload the new beta map. Not sure what map I'm supposed to use
700C, 900C, A00C, A01C, B00C, B01C, 700D, 900D, A00D, A01D, B00D and B01D
What's the difference between these files?

somejace 07-28-2014 02:24 AM

Well I went through this entire thread and didn't find a answer

What's the difference from the older version and this 'new' beta one.

I'm using e85 EL currently with zero issues.

Is it a difference that I should really make the upgrade or just continue what I'm using now. Thanks.

Brinks 07-28-2014 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somejace (Post 1868834)
Well I went through this entire thread and didn't find a answer

What's the difference from the older version and this 'new' beta one.

I'm using e85 EL currently with zero issues.

Is it a difference that I should really make the upgrade or just continue what I'm using now. Thanks.

If you download the new beta the changes are noted in a read me file.

YMAA 07-28-2014 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brinks (Post 1868821)
Just got my OFT, trying to upload the new beta map. Not sure what map I'm supposed to use
700C, 900C, A00C, A01C, B00C, B01C, 700D, 900D, A00D, A01D, B00D and B01D
What's the difference between these files?

You need to hook the tablet up to your car and read the stock ROM to know what version you have before you know which version to upload to the tablet. Have you done that yet?

Brinks 07-28-2014 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YMAA (Post 1868862)
You need to hook the tablet up to your car and read the stock ROM to know what version you have before you know which version to upload to the tablet. Have you done that yet?

Thanks. My car is on jacks right now for multiple reasons, I was just messing around with the OFM trying to preload the files. I'll hook it up tomorrow. I'm still curious why their are so many different version for the same software. I know it changes for 6mt-Auto but does it change for all the different trim levels depending on what type of electronics are available?

phrosty 07-28-2014 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brinks (Post 1868872)
Thanks. My car is on jacks right now for multiple reasons, I was just messing around with the OFM trying to preload the files. I'll hook it up tomorrow. I'm still curious why their are so many different version for the same software. I know it changes for 6mt-Auto but does it change for all the different trim levels depending on what type of electronics are available?

Just version numbers, not trim related. Like any software, the ECU code gets updates occasionally. The first run of cars got 700, and the latest run come with B01.

wparsons 07-28-2014 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxBrun0xx (Post 1868618)
Does the 93 stage 1 change anything other than another HP/tq curves? Eg idle speed, Rev limit, pedal position map, etc? Just curious if some of the changes people are noticing are plecebo?


If you want to see, just open up both ROMS in the RomRaider software and view the differences.

It's hard to give a placebo based on idle speed, pedal mapping, etc during WOT pulls.

I haven't checked, but I would suspect the 93 octane tunes have similar differences in mapping as the e85 tunes, just not as drastic. More spark advance to go with the increased detonation resistance.

355rockit 07-28-2014 12:26 PM

Will using the Sport button mess up the ECU re-learning after flashing the ROM? I was uncertain as to the affects of using the Sport button after the OTS tune is flashed. I was under the impression that the Sport button initiates some sort of throttle remapping.

Tt3Sheppard 07-28-2014 12:30 PM

Curious to see the difference between the 91 1.59 Stg 1 tune and this updated 93 tune. I've been running 93 octane since original flash. Will be trying this later today!

wparsons 07-28-2014 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 355rockit (Post 1869230)
Will using the Sport button mess up the ECU re-learning after flashing the ROM? I was uncertain as to the affects of using the Sport button after the OTS tune is flashed. I was under the impression that the Sport button initiates some sort of throttle remapping.

The sport button doesn't change mapping on the stock tune (or any OTS tunes).

Readytoxplod 07-28-2014 05:28 PM

downloaded 93oct A00c from beta 2.01, and launch control is active, how to I activate flat-foot shift? I tried it (shifting while on the accelerator without lifting fore shift) and it just revved to the limiter. How do I activate it?

CaptainSlow 07-28-2014 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readytoxplod (Post 1869776)
downloaded 93oct A00c from beta 2.01, and launch control is active, how to I activate flat-foot shift? I tried it (shifting while on the accelerator without lifting fore shift) and it just revved to the limiter. How do I activate it?


You have to reset the value to what you want...I think by default the FFS set point is right at the rev limiter (delta=0). In RomRaider open that value and reset it for about 600 or so...remember that it is a delta value, meaning the actual set point will be the rev limit (7600) minus your delta value. So, an input of delta=600 will give you a FFS set point of 7000 rpm

Venator 07-28-2014 05:59 PM

@Shiv@Openflash I have flashed the 1.5x tune stage one on my FRS, and especially in 3rd gear, when I hit ~4k RPM there is a loud noise almost like a vibration somewhere but I see nothing that is vibrating. Please help! I am flashing it back to stock until I hear from you. Definitely a bad sound...

Silver Ignition 07-28-2014 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Venator (Post 1869832)
@Shiv@Openflash I have flashed the 1.5x tune stage one on my FRS, and especially in 3rd gear, when I hit ~4k RPM there is a loud noise almost like a vibration somewhere but I see nothing that is vibrating. Please help! I am flashing it back to stock until I hear from you. Definitely a bad sound...

Any chance you're hearing the VVT kicking in?

Venator 07-28-2014 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver Ignition (Post 1869857)
Any chance you're hearing the VVT kicking in?

That was my thought too but it was loud!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.