Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB
Page 6 of 76 « First 2345 6 789101656 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Software Tuning (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   OpenFlash Tablet: OTS v2.0 Beta (132 new maps, 12 new XMLs) Available for Download (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70796)

akahenry 07-26-2014 03:40 AM
Just out of curiosity, If I was to buy the Open Flash Tablet in the next coming days/weeks, would it automatically come with the OTS 2.0 Maps preinstalled? If not, would it be preinstalled with maps from V1.59?

Shiv@Openflash 07-26-2014 03:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by akahenry (Post 1866615)
Just out of curiosity, If I was to buy the Open Flash Tablet in the next coming days/weeks, would it automatically come with the OTS 2.0 Maps preinstalled? If not, would it be preinstalled with maps from V1.59?
All OFTs are pre-loaded with the latest non-beta map release. In this case, v2.0 is currently in beta so OFTs are pre-loaded with v1.59 by default. But if you were to request it to be pre-loaded with v2.0, we can make that happen :)

Kids Heart 07-26-2014 04:14 AM
v2.0 stg1 93 feels awesome. Can't wait for my OFH to come in.

DocWalt 07-26-2014 04:20 AM
Ok, since I must surely be missing something, how do I disable the U0155 code? Not seeing it in RomRaider anywhere...

Can't wait to load up the tune tomorrow anyway :) Too late to go load it up now, unfortunately.

edeekeos 07-26-2014 05:06 AM
Hey guys,

I know this is kind of a moot point, but how's the valve-train noise around the 3500-4k range. In the previous tunes it was LOUD, I know that it's sort-of the 'nature of the beast' so to speak, but I'm just curious to see if it's been messed with. I have everything downloaded and ready to go, but won't be able to test things out until later on this coming week.

troek 07-26-2014 06:49 AM
man i cant wait for the A type rom to be ready

VacantSky 07-26-2014 07:07 AM
@Shiv@Openflash when I download the non ESC 2.01 from the site all the folders say ESC on them?

raven1231 07-26-2014 07:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrsDuke (Post 1866462)
my guess is he found power below where it used to "kick" so you don't feel it as much.


Same reason my car doesn't feel like it pulls as hard as it used to up top now that I have the nameless header. I have more power everywhere but particularly lower in the RPM so the top end doesn't feel as good despite having more power.
This! I have experienced the same thing when switching to E85 from 93

01s0uljah 07-26-2014 08:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malt (Post 1866306)
I'd venture to say that the stage one maps were the most revised of them all... so yes, significant differences.
Oh baby..

I love you Shiv...

WNDSRFR 07-26-2014 08:45 AM
Great work Shiv and Team.
Looks like the only thing you have left to do is the tune for NITROMETHANE!
Think about it.

wparsons 07-26-2014 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by edeekeos (Post 1866662)
Hey guys,

I know this is kind of a moot point, but how's the valve-train noise around the 3500-4k range. In the previous tunes it was LOUD, I know that it's sort-of the 'nature of the beast' so to speak, but I'm just curious to see if it's been messed with. I have everything downloaded and ready to go, but won't be able to test things out until later on this coming week.
Louder than stock, quieter than 1.59. It seems to pull stronger before that, so the onset of power isn't as drastic. I don't have any VD logs to compare, but overall I would say it pulls harder through the whole dip (stock header here).

Silver Ignition 07-26-2014 09:09 AM
Which tune should us BPB guys be running? The old BPB tune or one of the new 2.0 tunes?

xxBrun0xx 07-26-2014 09:50 AM
Just took it out for a spin. Car is bone stock except tune. 93 stage 1. Initial impressions: pedal almost seems to have a larger dead zone that on v1.5 (needs more throttle to get moving smoothly from stop). Almost stalled it the first time I pulled out. Noise seems about the same, maybe a little quieter. On 1.5, power seemed to really come in at 4.5k, whereas here, seems to kick around 5.5k. Hard to tell if there's any major improvements via the butt dyno. What are the major differences for stage 1?

wparsons 07-26-2014 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxBrun0xx (Post 1866764)
Just took it out for a spin. Car is bone stock except tune. 93 stage 1. Initial impressions: pedal almost seems to have a larger dead zone that on v1.5 (needs more throttle to get moving smoothly from stop). Almost stalled it the first time I pulled out. Noise seems about the same, maybe a little quieter. On 1.5, power seemed to really come in at 4.5k, whereas here, seems to kick around 5.5k. Hard to tell if there's any major improvements via the butt dyno. What are the major differences for stage 1?
The dead zone happens after every flash, the ECU needs a few drive cycles to re-learn the gas pedal input range.

As for the differences, check the release notes or the thread here about 1.6b features.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.
Page 6 of 76 « First 2345 6 789101656 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.