![]() |
Quote:
That's a bit extreme. The last gen 2.0L Impreza made 148hp. I'm pretty sure direct injection isn't going to get you a 67% increase in power. 10 to maybe 20% at the extreme sure. You'd have to be an engineering dufus or stuck in a broken Tardis to get 60hp/L in a performance engine. |
Quote:
http://blog.toyota.co.uk/tada-how-to...6#.U6uBD_ldWSo Tada: How Toyota and Subaru created the GT86 February 11th, 2013 by Toyota Blog Read Tetsuya Tada’s behind-the-scenes story on the development of the Toyota GT86. "So the project was on again and the initial approval was for us to take the Subaru engine as it was. This was for financial reasons. We persevered but one year into the project and both sides could see that while we had a sports car, it still needed a good power level of 100bhp per litre and also an environmental target of a maximum of 160g/km of carbon dioxide emissions. With the Subaru flat four as it was we could get one and not the other. If we wanted 160g/km we only got 60bhp per litre, which meant 120bhp in total; not enough." |
Quote:
So the 2013 Impreza NA is a gross polluter huh, mkay. I have to admit, I'm now intrigued to compare the emissions of the S2000 versus the FA20. Not that I really give a shit about polar bears humping, just curious about the products of different engineering constraints with different budgets at different times in history. |
Quote:
Couldn't edit, had to quote myself, sorry folks. Looks like S2000 is 236.3 g/km. Makes you wonder what Honda would have gotten being restricted to 160 g/km. 32% reduction. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think there is a high probability for Toyota to up the FA20 displacement into a FA25 for the 86 mid-cycle refresh. If Subaru is to drop the BRZ for the mid-cycle refresh, would they still be making the car for Toyota I wonder. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here's my wild ass guess: They'll drop in a new NA 2.5l FA25 for the mid cycle refresh and that engine will also be the basis for a turbo variant destined for the WRX STi. The NA version will maintain the 100hp/l and crank out 250hp with more lower end torque. The "I'd buy a FRS/BRZ if it only had 2XX amount of HP crowd" still won't be satisfied and sales won't meet the bean counters approval. This will give Toyota and Subaru a convenient excuse to dissolve the partnership and still save face. Toyota will push forward with their BMW relationship for the next generation GT86/FRS and Subaru will be able to greenlight the rumored SVX project as a replacement for the, "one of these things is not like the others", BRZ. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
its crazy how much this car parallels the starion/conquest:
twin car by two manufacturers (mitsu and chrysler) rwd lsd 2+2 weird fuel injection setup possibly will be boosted in some fashion before it gets cut after say two generations... if they make a widebody version of the twins ill shit myself. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I know, I was just making a comment about Subaru. For what it's worth, I think your prediction is right.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.