download and apply latest template file as well

Sorry for the delay, car's been in the shop after being vandalized. Took some time to clean up the code and added OL scaling too:

https://github.com/scalablecory/scalemaf

Now I'm getting really anal with my MAF scale, I've found that the intake air temp correction to be somewhat inconsistent to what I found earlier with around 95 vs 75 temps once the IAT get lower than 68 degrees... now the question is to zero or not to zero the IAT compensation tables or not. What do you guys think? Any thought or advice on the temp compensation, or just deal with it as is?

fyi, updated proggie is now posted.

We have the compensation tables... it seems like we should be able to anti-compensate to get more accurate corrections.

Link?

I would think so, but the compensation tables are a bit strange. It is zeroed at 68 degrees and at 11.23 g/s. At temps of 104 or above the compensations below 11.23 g/s is negative, but anything over 11.23 g/s it goes to positive. The inverse is true for temps below 68 degrees. Not sure of the logic behind this. I'd like to learn more about why it is done this way before making any changes.

I can't work it out, it must be due to the behavior of air at those temperatures.

As for zeroing out the IAT comp, just do it while doing the MAF and then put them back as stock would be my recommendation.

I suspect the table is correcting for errors in the maf sensor behaviour due to temperature rarther than trying to compensate for air density changes, i suspect that calculation is done in ecu code somewhere using iat.

Same place, link is on RR forum and I believe has been posted here.

I noticed a while ago that the car felt the nicest to drive when the outside temps were around 20c. If we could tweak the table for more performance when cold and a tad safer when warm I'd be very happy.

If there is a temp compensation table for ignition advance, it can be done. The nicer feeling you're getting at 20c is probably just the increased power from cooler iat. Though, this engine seems more knock prone when temps are higher. The iat compensation for maf scale will only dictate how much or little fueling correction the computer will make to hit your target afr.

The IAT is a load compensation table, not MAF.

There are 2 ignition timing vs IAT tables, one that changes timing depending on IAT and the other determines the % of that applied depending on RPM and load.

Really? So it's the load that gets adjusted... that would explain the relatively low % of adjustment in the table, I guess. I've decreased the entire IAT compensation table by .4%. I'll see if it has the desired result.