![]() |
They're closing the office my dad works at here in Kentucky too. He'll probably be going back to Georgetown instead of to Texas.
|
Missed this post minutes before mine about the same thing.
This decision goes beyond profits to politics, regulation and of course economics. It can't have been made lightly. With 4,000 white collar, highly paid, highly taxed (and upwards of 15,000 people counting spouses and family members) displaced, it's a travesty considering that it was completely avoidable. It's the most radical change in Toyota organization in over 50 years. But, California is a one-party state unfriendly to business that Sacramento believes must be taxed and regulated to redistribute income from producers to takers who vote. Sad. To add to the OP's quote, TM actually close up 0.54% today, not down as Bloomberg said and although their price is down this year they just bought back a huge chunk showing confidence looking forward no doubt due in part to this decision to relocate HQ to Texas. And as for property taxes, I'm paying 2.3% in Oregon counting state, county, metro (don't ask) and city taxes, above the highest amount listed that might not include local bond levies. |
Quote:
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view6/308...as-fight-o.gif [ame="http://youtu.be/ZnZ2XdqGZWU?t=2m42s"][/ame] |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
About what?
|
everyone is coming to Texas we are badass..Exxon is relocating like 10k employees here as well
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
When you look at the other side of the "property tax / housing cost" issue, you also have to think that they are making land more affordable in CA. I do feel bad for the employees that work at the HQ currently that do not wish to move, but do not be mistaken, they are definitely compensated for their loss of employment. Yes, we do have some of the highest property tax rates in the United States, but do not forget that we also have the lowest average housing costs in the United States.... So I say, I can get a bigger/better house for my money, but I will have to pay the Man to keep it... I'm ok with that! |
Quote:
I talked with some TMS associates tonight. Grief counselors were brought in to HQ today but there weren't enough to handle requests for help. So many of them also once dreamed of working for Toyota and relocated for the opportunity, and now this. |
Quote:
And I agree that if you already live in Texas then Toyota increasing the size of their operation in Texas is probably going to work toyour benefit. It's understandable that someone already employed by TMC in Texas might see personal benefit, however there is little good for the worker that comes of corporate relocation on a mass scale for companies that are already successful. There is no threat to Toyota's health here. This move is to decrease operating expenses and tax liability for TMC. In order realize these savings 8k-10k California workers will have these costs shifted directly to them. Yes, as noted housing is cheaper in TX. However those cheaper housing costs are offset by both much lower wages (for perhaps both the relocated worker and their spouse), higher property taxes and decreased property value over comparable properties in California. Who benefits here? TMC. For those who must choose corporate relocation or joblessness (even with a severance) this will likely be expensive and at the very least disruptive. To move, selling ones home (perhaps on a time crunch) forces workers to take whatever offers they can get. Breaking leases for renters can also be a cost. Losing access to family, & friends can also have significant costs as childcare, housing and transportation costs are often spread in the terms of familial child care, roommates, and ride sharing. Pulling children out of school, loss of social networks (groups, churches, etc), access to cultural centers, diversity, even weather are ancillary changes shouldered by the worker in the name of profit for TMC. Not referring to you Waukeen, but to those others that cheer lead corporate moves like this simply based on some form of state pride or political affiliation, those folks could probably spend some time walking in the shoes of those who will be soon forced into these life altering decisions that only further pad the pocket of a TMC and their investors. Compassion is something that we all will need some time or another. |
Given California demographics, the reality is ongoing economic decline.
It is home to one-third of the nation's welfare recipients. It has the highest poverty rate of any state. There has been net domestic out migration for 18 of the past 20 years while even international in migration, legal and otherwise, has stalled. Mexico has a lower unemployment rate than California. The aging population will continue to drain social services while birth rates decline. There won't be enough "compassion" to resolve these problems until conditions creating economic growth and jobs are in place but the opposite is happening. How much "compassion" will it take? Already, budgets are unsustainable, unfunded liabilities are bankrupting cities around the state now, debt and deficits are rising while the tax base is leaving. Toyota's announcement today should be a wakeup call, but some instead will demand yet more "compassion" that will only accelerate out migration. As I said earlier, this is a shameful, completely avoidable travesty and violation of the public trust. Of course the same thing happens every day in Washington, the difference is that California can't print money, only raise taxes (of course they won't cut spending) and drive businesses and productive, self-reliant people away. |
Quote:
Quote:
It is terrible that many jobs will be lost, and to be honest, most workers have known about this for quite some time, or at least saw this coming. This move has been almost 4 years in the making. Toyota is not a company known for pulling the rug out from underneath people. With two children of my own, I do absolutely agree with you about having to pull out of school and move children, and of their church/social groups. This is the part of this move that I don't like. We must adapt. I have moved with this company for similar reasons. Once to Canada, and then back to the USA. It was a very hard thing to do to my wife and children... I do not intend to state that this is an "all out" great thing. But it is unfortunately a necessary thing. It's hard to understand, and unfortunately I cannot tell you why it is necessary other than saying, there is a necessity for this move, and the reason it did not happen sooner is because Toyota did not want to cause any of their employees mental, or emotional trauma. They did try to stay. This move is non-political in nature, I can guarantee you that. I mean in no way to contradict you DAEMANO. I am just trying to make sure that the correct information is brought to light. I do agree that some companies tend to make this type of move in a cold, and non compassionate way. The sole reason that I work for Toyota is because of the fact that they do, in every way, try to take care of their employees as well as their faithful clients. I really do wish that it was possible to split this move between the two states to offer a dual HQ to keep the TMC employees that cannot move from Cali, and to be able to offer something new to those that can. This would be my wish in a perfect world... |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.