![]() |
I find the torque dip useful for comfortable driving cruising at 3k rpm / 55 mph, if you go over a bump on the highway and it shakes your foot it doesn't cause you to gun the engine
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The GT86 designers engineered in the torque dip to keep the rear tires from breaking traction during acceleration at highway speeds from all that goddamn torque.
|
I suspect twice the HP and torque would not make some of you any better drivers.
|
I like some torque dip with my tortilla chips; guacamole gets boring after a while.
Re: the relatively broad torque curve this car has (despite the dip): surprised nobody has mentioned the square bore:stroke ratio (86mm X 86mm). This is the ideal compromise between a torque-heavy but horsepower limiting undersquare ratio, and the all top end, got no guts down low characteristics of an oversquare configuration. |
Quote:
I mean, it seems such a simple thing to change, there must be a tradeoff somewhere. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the illegality is because they're too loud? |
Quote:
I haven't researched it but I'd be surprised if there weren't at least one or two certified aftermarket options out there. http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17985 |
I think about this often - would I prefer less torque but a more linear delivery (a-la s2000 or rx8).
I think the times I am thrashing the thing, or autoX, whatever - I'd appreciate a more top end heavy trade-off... BUT, this is my DD, and coming from a MUCH torquier history of cars before owning this one, i'll keep what it has. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.