Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   2012 BRZ/FR-S Stock Class Autocross Discussion (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6319)

EMguy 05-15-2012 10:31 PM

2012 BRZ/FR-S Stock Class Autocross Discussion
 
This is probably a little early as the BRZ/FR-S hasn't been classed yet, but it seems a good idea to have a single thread for those competing in stock class autocross.

Here's a quick run down of the hight points of the rules: Link to 2012 rules

-Stock sized wheels (17x7) with +/- 0.25 in (6.35mm) of offset allowance
-Shocks with up to two external adjustments (with stock springs)
-Substituion/removal of either the front or rear sway bar (but not both)
-If offered by the manufacturer, crash bolts are legal (Please Subaru/Scion!)
-Provided it passes sound, exhaust is free after the cat.
-A few other odds and ends

Tires:
The 245/40/17 A6 seems like the natural fit. 225/45/17 and 225/40/17 are other options if the front inboard strut clearance proves too tight.

Any thoughts?

Sccabrz192 05-15-2012 11:53 PM

I'll be competing stock class if/when I no longer have a seat in the solstice. I'm reserving all decisions on modifications until I atleast have the car, take some measurements and take a few runs. I dont like making changes until I have a baseline... The only exception to that is wheels... Which as mentioned in the other thread, not a lot of options at the moment. Though I will say i anticipate the 225/40 being fairly useless, sounds like the car is gearing challenged and a shorter sidewall will make it worse.

EMguy 05-16-2012 12:08 AM

Stock Class Legal Wheels
 
I'm copying over some info from another thread. I'll do my best to keep a running list of some of the stock sized wheels that would work well for autocross.

The stock class rules allow +/- 0.25 in (6.35mm) in offset. So any offset between 42 and 54 is legal. Spacers can be used to acheive maximum offset allowance. Given the relatively tight inboard clearance to the front strut and the fact that you'll want to stuff as much tire as possible in there, I'm thinking that shooting for a 42-43mm offset is probably a good idea.

Lightweight Wheel Options in 17x7, 5x100, ET 42-54:

-Kosei K4R (14 lbs)
-Buddy Club P1 Racing SF (17.4 lbs)
-Team Dynamics Pro Race 1.2 (17.3 lbs)*
-Motegi Traklite 1.0 (14.5 lbs)

*These won't be in stock in the right size, but TD will custom make individual orders to your specs with a 6-8 week lead time. They're reasonable priced, and 17.3 lbs.

Sccabrz192 05-16-2012 12:35 AM

Following bill's lead, you do have some rota options...

GR-A, Boost, and circuit 10 are available in +48
Subzero in a +45

Ill edit this Post if i find others.

Scooby South 05-16-2012 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moto-P (Post 213827)
I can't disclose what's in plan at HRE yet, but something VERY nice for the FRS/BRZ is coming yes :D

Ideally though, for race track use, I like to use probably something like 18x8.0 or 8.5, with TRD N1/Taikyu- specified tire size of 225/40ZR18 +45~48 on all four to keep the inherent balance and alignment data.

For street, just about anything goes as I am of the 80's tuner mentality, and I like them low, flush, and functional... The last word 'functional' being the key word though. not mad camber and not hellaflush widebody ride on sidewall craziness...no.. LOL! So perhaps a 18x9? 19x9? slightly pulled tire and agressive offset of about +30 on deep rim 3 piece? I dunno. I'm curious what HRE will pull out of the bag (though they are not casually affordable by any means), as well as new line from Volk, Work, SRR, and Enkei as well for this car rumored. Pro-Drive in white would be nice and racy too though!

There seems to be more options coming..:) ummmm HRE...$$$$$$

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 08:35 AM

So this means that you cannot go to a 17x8 wheel in the stock class?

Scooby South 05-16-2012 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark_Angle (Post 214005)
So this means that you cannot go to a 17x8 wheel in the stock class?

true....you never could...you have to run the Stock Size wheel..in this case 17x7... 17x8 would put you into street touring...

Bill

MTeator 05-16-2012 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark_Angle (Post 214005)
So this means that you cannot go to a 17x8 wheel in the stock class?

Nope... Have to stay stock dimensions... You can only play with offset a bit.

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 08:47 AM

So what class would this boot me to? Theoretically

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 08:48 AM

Sorry I posted too soon. Thanks Scooby South

Scooby South 05-16-2012 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark_Angle (Post 214009)
So what class would this boot me to? Theoretically

Whatever Street tire class it gets assigned... assuming right now...STX

Bill

Sccabrz192 05-16-2012 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooby South (Post 214004)
There seems to be more options coming..:) ummmm HRE...$$$$$$

Based on those comments id be surprised if hres were in a stock legal size.

AX_FRS 05-16-2012 11:00 AM

Would it be a good idea to get an oil catch can? I heard that the boxer engine has an especially hard time with blow-by. Any thoughts on this?

Scooby South 05-16-2012 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AX_FRS (Post 214101)
Would it be a good idea to get an oil catch can? I heard that the boxer engine has an especially hard time with blow-by. Any thoughts on this?

not necessary...unless you plan to boost the motor...I am pretty confident that the Factory Breather system is sufficient for the 12.5:1 compression the engine is producing...:)

Bill

Scooby South 05-16-2012 11:18 AM

I have never been one to race in stock class... just not in my nature... but If I were to compete in Stock class.. Here would be my take:

-Koni's with stock springs... Depending on what spring rate the FRS has Vs. BRZ I might change the springs out to one or the other.

-17x7 Light as possible wheel... maybe the Kosei with a 50 with a 5mm spacer to bring the tire back out away from the strut.

-not sure if 245 A6's will fit due to them running wide...might go with a Goodyear if that were the case.

-Swaybars are gray area right now on this vehicle.. have to wait and see the data.

-Lightweight Exhaust or my personal favorite is the JW2 Exhaust Turn-down..that completely eliminates the muffler... weight saved = about 40 pounds.

-Lightweight battery

-start with a base model FRS for weight savings..since weight is enemy in stock classes.

-crash bolts for front Camber if they become available.

-performance alignment...would definitely have to tinker with that to get optimum balance/turn-in/predictable agility

that would get me started..

Bill

Draco-REX 05-16-2012 11:43 AM

The damper rule has a loophole in it the size of a hangar door. You're allowed only two usable adjustments. Adjustments to damper's gas portion are not counted, and any hydraulic adujstments above two just need to be glued in place. So if you want to spend a crap-ton of money on dampers you can. Just put a dollop of a silicone sealer on the least used adjustments before you bring the car to tech.

Sccabrz192 05-16-2012 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooby South (Post 214119)
I have never been one to race in stock class... just not in my nature... but If I were to compete in Stock class.. Here would be my take:

-Koni's with stock springs... Depending on what spring rate the FRS has Vs. BRZ I might change the springs out to one or the other.

-17x7 Light as possible wheel... maybe the Kosei with a 50 with a 5mm spacer to bring the tire back out away from the strut.

-not sure if 245 A6's will fit due to them running wide...might go with a Goodyear if that were the case.

-Swaybars are gray area right now on this vehicle.. have to wait and see the data.

-Lightweight Exhaust or my personal favorite is the JW2 Exhaust Turn-down..that completely eliminates the muffler... weight saved = about 40 pounds.

-Lightweight battery

-start with a base model FRS for weight savings..since weight is enemy in stock classes.

-crash bolts for front Camber if they become available.

-performance alignment...would definitely have to tinker with that to get optimum balance/turn-in/predictable agility

that would get me started..

Bill

you wont be able to spring-swap in stock class. It has to be available from the manufacturer as an available package for the specific model of car you have.

Also I dont have my hopes up for a TSB from subaru for crash bolts. Its not something they typically do afaik. Technically the lame part of it all, if toyota offers them and releases a tsb and subaru doesnt, you will only be able to use crash bolts on the frs.

Last comment, you will want a smaller offset, positive offset puts the hub outboard of wheel center which drives the wheel more under the car. A +42 total offset will likely be optimal for stock class to get the most tire without rubbing the strut

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooby South (Post 214119)
I have never been one to race in stock class... just not in my nature... but If I were to compete in Stock class.. Here would be my take:

-Koni's with stock springs... Depending on what spring rate the FRS has Vs. BRZ I might change the springs out to one or the other.

-17x7 Light as possible wheel... maybe the Kosei with a 50 with a 5mm spacer to bring the tire back out away from the strut.

-not sure if 245 A6's will fit due to them running wide...might go with a Goodyear if that were the case.

-Swaybars are gray area right now on this vehicle.. have to wait and see the data.

-Lightweight Exhaust or my personal favorite is the JW2 Exhaust Turn-down..that completely eliminates the muffler... weight saved = about 40 pounds.

-Lightweight battery

-start with a base model FRS for weight savings..since weight is enemy in stock classes.

-crash bolts for front Camber if they become available.

-performance alignment...would definitely have to tinker with that to get optimum balance/turn-in/predictable agility

that would get me started..

Bill


So this is all stock legal?

Sccabrz192 05-16-2012 12:48 PM

Lightweight battery would also technically be protestable because blatant weight reduction is against the stock rules

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sccabrz192 (Post 214204)
you wont be able to spring-swap in stock class. It has to be available from the manufacturer as an available package for the specific model of car you have.

Also I dont have my hopes up for a TSB from subaru for crash bolts. Its not something they typically do afaik. Technically the lame part of it all, if toyota offers them and releases a tsb and subaru doesnt, you will only be able to use crash bolts on the frs.

Last comment, you will want a smaller offset, positive offset puts the hub outboard of wheel center which drives the wheel more under the car. A +42 total offset will likely be optimal for stock class to get the most tire without rubbing the strut

Does this exclude TRD items? They are specific for these cars from toyota.

Sccabrz192 05-16-2012 12:51 PM

Any performance related accessory, even if it is sold from the dealership which is not original equipment as part of an option or trim package is illegal unless it meets the modification guidelines. This includes TRD accessories.

Examples:
Legal: Trd front swaybar (provided you dont install a trd rear swaybar and vise versa.)

Illegal: dealer installed TRD springs. Unless Scion offers a TRD performance variant of the car as an option code. It that case you would need every piece of that equipment package. If the option package came with different seats and springs, you couldnt install the springs without the seats.

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 12:56 PM

So removing the exhaust and adding the shorty pipe is probably a no no.

EMguy 05-16-2012 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 214146)
The damper rule has a loophole in it the size of a hangar door. You're allowed only two usable adjustments. Adjustments to damper's gas portion are not counted, and any hydraulic adujstments above two just need to be glued in place. So if you want to spend a crap-ton of money on dampers you can. Just put a dollop of a silicone sealer on the least used adjustments before you bring the car to tech.

The rules reads as this:


No more than two separate external shock damping adjustment controls are allowed. This permits the use of shocks which originally came with more than two external adjustments, which have been converted to double-adjustables, only if the additional adjustment controls have been permanently disabled (e.g. via weld-ing, epoxying, grinding off). Gas pressure adjustment is not con-sidered a damping adjustment.


The key is "permanently disabled." I don't think a dab of silicone or glue counts. Moreover, I doubt you'll find many competitors trying to find an excuse to spend more money on triple adjustable, stock class legal shocks. The sipirit of the rule is a cost containment measure.

You're right about the gas pressure adjustment though: tuning gas pressure is one way of working around OEM spring rates.

jdrxb9 05-16-2012 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sccabrz192 (Post 214227)
Lightweight battery would also technically be protestable because blatant weight reduction is against the stock rules

Battery replacement is covered on p71 of the rules - helpfully linked by the OP:
Code:

Alternate components which are normally expendable and considered
replacement parts (e.g., engine and wheel bearings, seals, gaskets,
filters, belts, bolts, bulbs, batteries, brake rotors, clutch discs, pressure
plates, suspension bushings, drivetrain mounts, fenders, trim pieces,
etc.) may be used provided they are essentially identical to the standard
parts (e.g. have the same type, size, hardness, weight, material etc.),
are used in the same location, and provide no performance benefit.


Sccabrz192 05-16-2012 01:00 PM

If its after the cat its legal per the exhaust allowance if it replaces or removes or is in front of the cat, yes it is illegal. I am not aware of the part you are referring to so im not 100% what it does.

EMguy 05-16-2012 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark_Angle (Post 214238)
So removing the exhaust and adding the shorty pipe is probably a no no.

That depends. You can do anything you want to the exhaust downstream of the catalytic converter. It's common to replace everything from that point on with a turn down pipe. The benefit is not power, but weight.

Since last year, there is an additional rule for national (and some local) events that cars must also pass sound requirements. This is <100 db at 50 ft. It's usually tested at an area of WOT.

In a stock car, with cats in place, I don't think there will be any problem passing sound just a turn down. Personally, I'll be looking for the lightest, single exit cat-back I can find.

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 01:15 PM

I will probably leave it all alone because changing weight will change the handling characteristics of the car.

jdrxb9 05-16-2012 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sccabrz192 (Post 214204)
you wont be able to spring-swap in stock class. It has to be available from the manufacturer as an available package for the specific model of car you have.

Also I dont have my hopes up for a TSB from subaru for crash bolts. Its not something they typically do afaik. Technically the lame part of it all, if toyota offers them and releases a tsb and subaru doesnt, you will only be able to use crash bolts on the frs.

Last comment, you will want a smaller offset, positive offset puts the hub outboard of wheel center which drives the wheel more under the car. A +42 total offset will likely be optimal for stock class to get the most tire without rubbing the strut

I'll be surprised if we see a TSB from Toyota because: AFAIK they've been putting the alignment/crash bolt info in the FSM for a while now; the FR-S manual shows the procedure with only one alternate bolt (which is actually the lower bolt used in the upper position instead of the normal upper bolt); the bolts do not have part numbers anything like the normal Toyota alignment/crash bolts. (link,link)

Since I'm pretty sure I'm getting a BRZ, I'm hoping we 1) don't need much static camber due to low roll, and 2) I'm right about no FR-S TSB :)

EMguy 05-16-2012 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark_Angle (Post 214271)
I will probably leave it all alone because changing weight will change the handling characteristics of the car.

Yes, it will change the handling characteristics of the car.... For the better.

Less weight is always a good thing. (so long as it doesn't compromise safety, structural integrity, etc.)

Sccabrz192 05-16-2012 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdrxb9 (Post 214302)
I'll be surprised if we see a TSB from Toyota because: AFAIK they've been putting the alignment/crash bolt info in the FSM for a while now; the FR-S manual shows the procedure with only one alternate bolt (which is actually the lower bolt used in the upperr position instead of the upper lower bolt); the bolts do not have part numbers anything like the normal Toyota alignment/crash bolts. (link,link)

Since I'm pretty sure I'm getting a BRZ, I'm hoping we 1) don't need much static camber due to low roll, and 2) I'm right about no FR-S TSB :)

Wow, 3/4 degree adjustment? Lol

Scooby South 05-16-2012 02:09 PM

hmmmm..sorry.didnt know the omplete stock ruleset....but I would expect lots of griping about this car
...already hearing rumblings of the Miata contengent bitching about it....and 3/4 of a degree is better than nothing...:)

Bill

jdrxb9 05-16-2012 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EMguy (Post 213616)
Lightweight Wheel Options in 17x7, 5x100, ET 42-54:

-Kosei K4R (14 lbs)
-Buddy Club P1 Racing SF (17.4 lbs)
-Team Dynamics Pro Race 1.2 (17.3 lbs)*

*These won't be in stock in the right size, but TD will custom make individual orders to your specs with a 6-8 week lead time. They're reasonable priced, and 17.3 lbs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sccabrz192 (Post 213650)
Following bill's lead, you do have some rota options...

GR-A, Boost, and circuit 10 are available in +48
Subzero in a +45

Ill edit this Post if i find others.

some more:
Code:

Kosei K1-TS      avail now in ET50 - listed at kosei's website in 42, but can't find a source in that offset
Kosei K3        listed at kosei's website in 42, can't find a source
Enkei            EV5,G5,Klamp,T-Fork - all 18+ lb, 45 or 48
Enkei            RPF1 - enkei lists a ET48, but can't find a source
Enkei            RPF1,RS+M,PF01 - all options at ET43 or ET45 with custom lug pattern drilling
Motegi          MR121 ET48 17lb
Tenzo            DC-5 and DC-6 ET42 ~17.5lb
Kyowa            228 ET42 ~17lb


Scooby South 05-16-2012 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark_Angle (Post 214238)
So removing the exhaust and adding the shorty pipe is probably a no no.

nope....look at my thread...towards the end and you will see the pipe I am talking about...:)..that is legal for stock

Bill

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EMguy (Post 214305)
Yes, it will change the handling characteristics of the car.... For the better.

Less weight is always a good thing. (so long as it doesn't compromise safety, structural integrity, etc.)

Dont forget that if you lose weight then you will be messing with the distribution that I am sure that scion designed for. This could cause over/understeering characteristics. Yes you are saving weight but at what cost.

If you take off the same amount from the front of the car you would be back to the origiional distribution.

I bet you could drop about 100lbs. from the rear without trying very hard. Spare tire and tools along with the exhaust, truck carpet. Might get you close.

Scooby South 05-16-2012 02:36 PM

trunk junk has already been weighed at 35lbs...muffler is about 40lbs..

Bill

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooby South (Post 214410)
trunk junk has already been weighed at 35lbs...muffler is about 40lbs..

Bill


Not bad

How about rear seat? The fold down and seat itself.

Sccabrz192 05-16-2012 02:59 PM

Cant remove seats. You will be reducing the yaw moment by removing trunk junk and muffler weight but slightly moving the cg location forward. In the grand scheme of things, you wont be able to tell from a vehicle dynamic standpoint.

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 03:03 PM

Seats

Per class rules???

AX_FRS 05-16-2012 03:27 PM

Per class rules, you can't remove seats. You know, you could actually download the rule book in its entirity from SCCA for free. And the stock section isn't that long, only about 9 pages (if you don't count all the clarifications and classing pages).

Dark_Angle 05-16-2012 03:50 PM

That book gives me a head ache. I currently am going through a build and the SCCA rule book makes me go cross eyed. durrrrr


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.